On Tuesday the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court upheld the right of unions to serve as the exclusive representatives of employees in public sector bargaining units. In Branch v. Commonwealth Employment Relations Board, four government employees represented by unions challenged the state’s labor law on constitutional grounds, claiming that the law’s mandatory agency fee and exclusive representation provisions violated the First Amendment. The Supreme Judicial Court held that the employees’ First Amendment challenge to the mandatory agency fee provision was moot. The Court pointed to the unions’ voluntary abandonment of fee collection following Janus v. AFSCME, which outlawed mandatory agency fees in the public sector. On the issue of exclusive representation, the Court recognized that the policy “is necessary to effectively and efficiently negotiate collective bargaining agreements and thus promote peaceful and productive labor-management relations.” The Court explained that an “uninterrupted line” of Supreme Court cases has affirmed exclusive representation for unions so long as it is coupled with a duty of fair representation. The employees asserted that the law unconstitutionally compelled them to associate with unions because the unions barred them from having input into or participating in contract negotiations unless they were members. But the Court said that the duty of fair representation in the bargaining context centers around whether the ultimate agreement discriminates against nonmembers, not about who the union includes in negotiations. The Court also noted that nonmembers can vote against the union in an initial election or vote to decertify it, affording dissenters adequate protection.
Ed Rensi, the former president and CEO of McDonald’s USA, criticized the corporation’s recent announcement that it would no longer oppose campaigns to increase the minimum wage, calling it “a path of political correctness” and “a public relations coup for its detractors at the Service Employees International Union.” Rensi stressed that the burden of higher wage mandates would fall on franchisees, who he claims are already struggling to turn a profit. In December, franchisees formed a National Owners Association aimed at bargaining with corporate headquarters to push back against costly operational changes.
Bloomberg Law reports that the Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) intends to target corporate law firms that do business with the government for their lackluster diversity and discriminatory practices. The announcement follows a surge of sex discrimination lawsuits against firms such as Jones Day, Ogletree Deakins, and Proskauer Rose. One open question that the Department of Labor plans to answer through guidance is whether the OFCCP has jurisdiction over discrimination against firm partners since the partners are generally classified as shareholders or owners and not as employees. At the least, the OFCCP believes it can investigate cases in which firms have failed to promote employees to partnership since those workers retain their status as employees. Two priorities are sex discrimination related to paid leave and discrimination against people with disabilities.
As Martin discussed on Monday and as Politico reported yesterday, unions are taking a different approach to the presidential primary endorsement process for 2020 than they did for 2016. When a handful of unions endorsed Hillary Clinton in the early months of the campaign that year, some rank-and-file members supportive of other candidates, particularly Bernie Sanders, protested. Cautious about upsetting their bases this time around, union leaders are meeting with candidates but waiting to make an endorsement, if they plan on making one at all. Yesterday nine candidates addressed a conference of the North American Building Trades Unions, where they talked about issues such as infrastructure spending, a $15 federal minimum wage, apprenticeships, and rolling back states’ ability to adopt right-to-work laws.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
February 24
DOJ drops Space-X complaint; Unions and agencies respond to Musk
February 23
Trump's attacks on federal workforce make way through courts; Trump NLRB requests Cemex bargaining order; Colorado's Direct Care Workforce Stabilization Board
February 21
In today’s News & Commentary, Trump spending cuts continue to threaten federal workers, and Google AI workers allege violations of labor rights. Trump’s massive federal spending cuts have put millions of workers, both inside and outside the federal government, in jeopardy. Yesterday, thousands of workers at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs research office were […]
February 20
President Trump's labor secretary pick retreats from some of her pro-labor stances during Senate confirmation hearing and Lynn Rhinehart discusses implications of NLRB and other agency removals.
February 19
In today’s news and commentary, Lori Chavez-Deremer’s confirmation hearing, striking King Soopers workers return to the bargaining table, and UAW members at Rolls-Royce authorize a strike. Lori Chavez-Deremer, President Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Labor, faces a Senate confirmation hearing today. Chavez-Deremer may face more No votes from Republicans than other Trump cabinet members. Rand […]
February 18
In today’s news and commentary, an air traffic union examines the impact of federal aviation worker firings, Southwest Airlines lays off 15% of its corporate workforce, and the NLRB’s General Counsel withdraws Biden-era memos Following the Trump Administration’s dismissal of hundreds of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) employees, the National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA), a […]