Tag

#agency fees

Home » agency fees

20 posts

February 28th, 2019

Today’s News & Commentary — February 28, 2019

Published February 28th, 2019 -

Later this morning, Senator Richard Blumenthal and Representatives Hank Johnson and Jerry Nadler will hold a press conference announcing the Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal (FAIR) Act, a bill that would amend the Federal Arbitration Act to exempt mandatory... More »

Bookmark?Remove?

Exclusive Representation and the First Amendment

Published February 13th, 2019 -

In Janus, the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibits mandatory agency fees in the public sector. Although Janus had nothing to do with the constitutional status of exclusive representation, the majority’s opinion mentions exclusive represe... More »

December 19th, 2018

Today’s News & Commentary — December 19, 2018

Published December 19th, 2018 -

In wage and Auer news, Bloomberg reports that a potential Supreme Court ruling upending “Auer deference” could magnify judicial oversight of federal agencies enforcing labor and employment law.  Named after the Supreme Court’s decision in Auer v. Robbins and d... More »

July 19th, 2018

Today’s News & Commentary — July 19, 2018

Published July 19th, 2018 -

This week the U.S. Labor Department formally rescinded the Obama-era “persuader rule” that mandated employers to disclose information about their one-on-one communications with union-avoidance consultants.  The rule was promulgated under the Labor-Management R... More »

Bookmark?Remove?

Janus and the Problem with Alleging Lochnerism

Published May 4th, 2018 -

Janus, the Court’s case about public sector agency fees that will be decided this term, is a case that could be framed in two ways. On the one hand, Janus is a case about compelled political speech: the government, by imposing agency fees as a condition of emp... More »

 

Coverage After the Janus Oral Argument

Published February 28th, 2018 -

The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Monday in Janus.  Analyses report that, as expected, there were pointed questions for AFSCME and Illinois by Justices Alito and Kennedy; the four liberal justices took every opportunity to highlight the potential effect... More »

 

Janus Oral Argument Transcript

Published February 26th, 2018 -

The Supreme Court has posted the transcript of this morning’s oral argument in Janus.  Notably, Justice Gorsuch, expected to be the deciding vote, did not speak during the argument.  We’ll have more coverage of the oral argument later this week. More »

February 23rd, 2018

Today’s News & Commentary — February 23, 2018

Published February 23rd, 2018 -

In advance of Monday’s oral argument in Janus, Bloomberg and the New York Times consider what might become of public sector unions if Abood is overruled. In These Times has a long feature on the advocacy groups who are funding not only Janus but also oth... More »

 

Janus Amicus: Economists & Law Professors

Published January 30th, 2018 -

A group of over two dozen economists and law and economics professors filed an amicus in Janus in support of the respondents.  The brief argues that “decades if not centuries of economic theory and empirical evidence” establish that many who pay ag... More »

 

Janus Amicus: Labor & Employment Law Professors

Published January 29th, 2018 -

Several leading professors of labor and employment law have filed an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Janus.  The brief, authored by Samuel Estreicher, was filed by Cynthia Estlund, Estreicher, Julius Getman, William Gould, Michael Harper, and The... More »

 

Janus Amicus: Ben Sachs

Published January 22nd, 2018 -

An amicus filed on Friday in Janus and based on Ben’s new article Agency Fees and the First Amendment, 131 Harv. L. Rev. 1046 urges the Court to reject Janus’s challenge on the ground that it does not raise a valid First Amendment claim.  The amicu... More »

 

AFSCME’s Brief in Janus

Published January 18th, 2018 -

AFSCME filed its response brief in Janus last week.  It defends Abood‘s distinction between collective bargaining and lobbying as doctrinally sound and makes a number of other arguments. Jurisdiction AFSCME first argues that the Court lacks subject matte... More »