Vail Kohnert-Yount is a student at Harvard Law School.
President Trump acknowledged on Twitter on Monday that the White House required staff to sign nondisclosure agreements, which his aides have declined to confirm for months. Although legal experts say such agreements are essentially unenforceable for government employees because they infringe on First Amendment rights, the admission raises the question of how nondisclosure agreements—even those that are clearly unenforceable—chill employees’ reports of wrongdoing in their workplaces.
A legal reporter wrote about how employment contracts are rolling back workers’ rights in insidious ways—including her own experience signing a non-compete clause in her employment contract with a legal news publisher. Stephanie Russell-Kraft, now a freelance journalist, shared her not-uncommon story about being unaware of the non-compete provision in her employment contract with Law360 until she left for a new job. “Non-compete provisions are often buried deep in the piles of paper passed to employees on their first day of work,” Russell-Kraft wrote in The Progressive. “They’re similar in that regard to mandatory arbitration provisions, which bar workers from bringing collective claims against their employers in court.” The proliferation of non-compete, non-disparagement, and mandatory arbitration clauses in a society where social benefits like health care are tied to employment contracts has created “a new kind of indentured servitude,” she argues.
Over the weekend, thousands of security officers in Silicon Valley ratified their first contract in one of the largest private sector organizing efforts in California history. The SEIU United Service Workers West union approved a contract with four major security services companies, Securitas, Allied Universal, G4S and Cypress Security, some of whom provide services to tech companies including Facebook and Google. The contract will raise wages up to $1.20 an hour by January and make employers contribute more money for health care costs.
The New York Times editorial board investigated why long-haul truckers’ paychecks keep falling, even as the trucking industry complains it can’t find enough drivers. Ultimately, the federal government’s deregulation of the trucking industry beginning in the 1970s and 1980s, which weakened unions and created bigger financial incentives to lower costs, started the decline in truckers’ real wages, the board concluded.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
May 9
Philadelphia City Council unanimously passes the POWER Act; thousands of federal worker layoffs at the Department of Interior expected; the University of Oregon student workers union reach a tentative agreement, ending 10-day strike
May 8
Court upholds DOL farmworker protections; Fifth Circuit rejects Amazon appeal; NJTransit navigates negotiations and potential strike.
May 7
U.S. Department of Labor announces termination of mental health and child care benefits for its employees; SEIU pursues challenge of NLRB's 2020 joint employer rule in the D.C. Circuit; Columbia University lays off 180 researchers
May 6
HHS canceled a scheduled bargaining session with the FDA's largest workers union; members of 1199SEIU voted out longtime union president George Gresham in rare leadership upset.
May 5
Unemployment rates for Black women go up under Trump; NLRB argues Amazon lacks standing to challenge captive audience meeting rule; Teamsters use Wilcox's reinstatement orders to argue against injunction.
May 4
In today’s news and commentary, DOL pauses the 2024 gig worker rule, a coalition of unions, cities, and nonprofits sues to stop DOGE, and the Chicago Teachers Union reaches a remarkable deal. On May 1, the Department of Labor announced it would pause enforcement of the Biden Administration’s independent contractor classification rule. Under the January […]