Gurtaran Johal is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, several companies dispute NLRB regional directors’ authority to make rulings while the Board lacks a quorum; the Department of Justice loses approximately 4,500 employees to the Trump Administration’s buyout offers; and a judge dismisses Columbia faculty’s lawsuit over the institution’s funding cuts.
Bloomberg Law reports that several employers are contesting the NLRB’s regional directors’ authority to render decisions on union representation while the Board lacks a quorum. Numerous companies are currently waiting for the Board to review regional directors’ decisions in union election cases. However, the Board cannot issue decisions regarding the regional directors’ decisions until it regains a quorum. Once it regains a quorum, the Board is unlikely to rule in favor of the companies, demonstrating that the companies are proposing this argument in order to bring their requests before the courts. If this argument is successful, the Board’s power in the absence of a quorum will be limited, impeding its ability to delegate power to regional directors. This argument is especially significant in the current context, after President Trump fired Board member Gwynne Wilcox in January.
Meanwhile, the Department of Justice lost approximately 4,500 staffers to the Trump Administration’s “Fork in the Road” deferred resignation program. The Trump Administration contends that these staffing cuts will result in an estimated $470 million in budgetary savings. The resignation program incentivizes employees to leave federal government service by offering payment through September; on the other hand, if they decide to stay in their positions, they could be fired. In February, Judge George O’Toole of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled that the program could continue, after finding that the plaintiffs, who were several unions, lacked standing to bring suit and did not have the jurisdiction to stop the program. This is only the beginning of further planned reductions, as 1,500 positions in the FBI are set to be eliminated as well.
Lastly, on Monday, June 16th, Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed a lawsuit that two unions, the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), representing Columbia University faculty members brought forth suing the Trump administration for its funding cuts against the university. AAUP and AFT argued that the funding cuts represented an unlawful method to overpower Columbia’s “academic autonomy.” Despite this, Judge Vyskocil held that the unions lacked standing to sue, stating that Columbia, rather than the unions, should bring forth a case against the funding cuts. However, AAUP and AFT appealed the decision on the same day, emphasizing their commitment to protecting academic freedom.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
June 25
NLRB orders Amazon to bargain with workers; federal judge blocks ICE agents from making arrests in courthouses.
June 24
NYC primary vies for union support; NLRB ruling tees up Cemex challenge; Sixth Circuit deals blow to NLRB policymaking.
June 23
The Supreme Court declines review of a taxpayer lawsuit against a teacher union's paid leave policy; Congressional Democrats oppose Labor Department's proposed joint employer rule.
June 22
Pro-labor candidate wins DC mayoral primary; Department of Labor secures court order regarding back wages.
June 21
The Bolivian government declares a state of emergency in response to union-led protests, and hotel workers in Philadelphia strike amidst World Cup celebrations.
June 19
The Supreme Court declines to hear a challenge to a Ninth Circuit decision upholding Thryv remedies, and tech workers receive mixed messaging about AI use.