Ajayan Williamson is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, California’s rideshare deal moves to the Governor’s desk; Boeing reaches a tentative deal with striking workers; and the FTC steps up scrutiny of noncompete agreements in the healthcare industry.
On Tuesday, the California state legislature passed a bill enabling Uber and Lyft drivers to unionize. Governor Gavin Newsom said last month that he would sign the bill; once he does, California will become the second state (following Massachusetts) to allow unions for rideshare workers. However, as Finlay wrote last month, lawmakers secured support for the bill by packaging it with SB 371, a companion bill that greatly reduces the amount of insurance coverage the companies are required to provide. Moreover, the companies aren’t likely to play nice with a potential union: As CalMatters reports, an Uber spokesperson refused to say whether the company would bargain in good faith if drivers unionized.
Yesterday, Boeing reached a tentative agreement with the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, potentially ending a strike that has lasted since the beginning of August. The strike began after the union rejected a proposed agreement from Boeing; the deal follows Boeing’s announcement that it would begin hiring permanent replacements for striking workers. The company says that the new proposal would raise wages by an average of 45%, and the deal restores a signing bonus that had become a point of contention. However, the deal still needs to be approved in a vote that will take place tomorrow, and some striking workers have signaled ambivalence towards the terms of the agreement.
Finally, letters released yesterday show that the FTC is increasing scrutiny of noncompete agreements in the healthcare industry. The letters were sent to an undisclosed set of healthcare providers, and they noted the agency’s statutory authority to investigate unfair methods of competition, including noncompetes. The agency encouraged the companies to review their agreements “to ensure that they comply with applicable laws.” Though the FTC announced last week that it was vacating the Biden administration’s blanket ban on noncompete agreements nationwide, Chairman Andrew Ferguson has indicated his opposition to these agreements under certain circumstances: this week’s move might be an example of what the administration’s policy will look like going forward.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 3
Unions seek a preliminary injunction to prevent USDA downsizing; the D.C. District Court issues a preliminary injunction against new student loan regulations; Matt Bruenig releases an analysis of Starbucks’ ongoing legal battle against Starbucks Workers United.
July 2
First Circuit denies federal worker unions’ mandamus petition; federal court denies preliminary injunction against new union reporting rule; House introduces the Securing Agriculture’s Workforce Act.
July 1
Trump nominates Keith Sonderling as Labor Secretary; DOL eliminates disparate-impact liability from Title VI regulations; OPM finalizes rule allowing suitability-based removal of federal employees for post-appointment conduct.
June 30
SCOTUS ends removal protections for agencies; staff at NYC cocktail bar vote to unionize.
June 29
In today’s News and Commentary, student-athletes file a class action suit challenging the NCAA’s new Age-Based Rule, a federal judge declines to issue a preliminary injunction against FEMA’s reduction in force but expedites proceedings, and Gavin Newsom opposes California’s proposed billionaire tax in favor of a federal approach. On Thursday, DeJuan Campbell, at basketball player […]
June 28
Philadelphia utility workers announce July 4 strike; national parks workers vote to unionize; Michigan considers “right to disconnect” bill.