Justin Cassera is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, the Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the May jobs report and the Office of the United States Trade Representative proposes new tariffs based on findings of forced labor.
On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported that the U.S. economy added 172,000 jobs in May, indicating a resilient labor market amid growing energy and inflationary crises. As expected, the education and healthcare sectors were among the largest contributors to the reported growth, as well as a more surprising gain of 70,000 positions in the leisure and hospitality industry. Although the national unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3%, concerns about wage growth falling behind inflation continue to grow. According to the report, average hourly earnings have increased by 3.4 percent over the last year, coming up short of the 3.8% inflation rate reported in April. The government will release the May inflation report later this week, with many members of the FOMC already signaling a willingness to raise rates in the coming months.
Last week, the Office of the United States Trade Representative made findings and proposed action on 60 countries who have “fail[ed] to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor.” Finding that these failures “unreasonabl[y] . . . burden[] or restrict[] U.S. commerce,” the Trade Representative proposed “additional duties on all products of the investigated economies.” The proposed tariffs range from 10–12.5% and are targeted at, among others, the European Union, Canada, Mexico, China, and Japan. In announcing the proposal, Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated, “The failure of our most important trading partners to address the importation of goods made with forced labor is unacceptable. This creates a dynamic where American workers are forced to compete globally on an unlevel playing field.” Spokespeople for China and the European Union, however, disagreed, characterizing the proposal as “unjustified” and inflexible “unilateral restrictions.” Public comments on the proposal are due by July 6, 2026.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 2
First Circuit denies federal worker unions’ mandamus petition; federal court denies preliminary injunction against new union reporting rule; House introduces the Securing Agriculture’s Workforce Act.
July 1
Trump nominates Keith Sonderling as Labor Secretary; DOL eliminates disparate-impact liability from Title VI regulations; OPM finalizes rule allowing suitability-based removal of federal employees for post-appointment conduct.
June 30
SCOTUS ends removal protections for agencies; staff at NYC cocktail bar vote to unionize.
June 29
In today’s News and Commentary, student-athletes file a class action suit challenging the NCAA’s new Age-Based Rule, a federal judge declines to issue a preliminary injunction against FEMA’s reduction in force but expedites proceedings, and Gavin Newsom opposes California’s proposed billionaire tax in favor of a federal approach. On Thursday, DeJuan Campbell, at basketball player […]
June 28
Philadelphia utility workers announce July 4 strike; national parks workers vote to unionize; Michigan considers “right to disconnect” bill.
June 26
Mamdani issues workplace heat protections order; Fifth Circuit denies enforcement of NLRB order against Starbucks; AFGE unlikely to secure injunction against FEMA layoffs.