Elias Decker is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, Senators advance on college athlete rights bill, and USDA strains OSHA with proposed meat production lines speed-up.
In a statement on Wednesday, Senators including Ted Cruz and Maria Cantwell released a statement announcing the bipartisan Protect College Sports Act. The bill introduces federal legislation to protect student-athletes’ ability to earn money off of their name, image, and likeness (so-called “NIL”), to extend requirements for schools to share revenue with student-athletes, and to require that schools cover student-athletes’ medical expenses. In exchange, the bill limits student-athletes to one transfer in their collegiate careers, gives schools and the NCAA some antitrust protections, and preempts any state or local laws. For certain legislators, this bill is more about protecting the institution of college sports than student-athletes’ rights or well-being. Senator Cruz said that college sports are “at a breaking point,” requiring “real rules, competitive balance, rivalries, and a true connection to education.” Such sentiments are likely informed by the recent spate of massive settlements between student-athletes and schools, such as the recent $1.8 billion settlement over student-athlete pay involving the NCAA. The bill, as proposed, is notably silent on the question of union organizing, extending the uncertainty left by the 2016 NLRB decision Northwestern University.
USDA’s proposal to speed up production lines for pork and poultry will strain OSHA’s ability to protect workers in the already-dangerous industry. USDA made this proposal in February, saying it would “update” speed requirements in these industries. The proposal’s stated goal is to help lower the cost of meat for consumers. As it stands, these workers already face slippery floors, dangerous equipment, and biological hazards on a daily basis. Additionally, the fine motor actions required in butchery already lead to carpal tunnel at a rate seven times the national average. As a result, OSHA has specifically identified fast-paced work as a risk in this line of work. OSHA has cited for violating safety conditions in meat-packing plants. This can put employers in an economic and legal bind, balancing profits-through-speed against worker injury and legal compliance. Margo Wolf O’Donnell, employment-law attorney withBenesch Law, said “I know that pricing is really a big concern, but they also need to be mindful of the legal ramifications as well.” The USDA contends, however, that the proposal does not actually interfere with OSHA’s ability to regulate these workplace risks. OSHA has not commented.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 12
Postal workers demand investigation into Atlanta distribution center conditions following deaths; University of Chicago Press Workers vote to unionize.
July 10
Brigham and Women’s Hospital locks out 4,000 nurses after one-day strike; appeal filed challenging agency-shop agreements.
July 9
The Second Circuit declines to vacate an arbitration award over a nursing union dispute; federal workers sue the Department of Defense for termination of union contracts; New York City announces settlement with companies for violating New York work laws.
July 8
DOL plans to make changes to the PERM immigration program; three-day hearing on proposed forced-labor tariffs is underway; Mamdani recovers $2.3M in corporate settlements.
July 7
Former EEOC Commissioner drops her wrongful termination lawsuit following the Supreme Court’s ruling on Presidential removal power; unions sue Department of Defense over cancellation of collective bargaining agreements.
July 6
NY home health worker class action settlement secures preliminary approval; the NLRB upholds order finding Amazon violated federal labor law.