Justin Cassera is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, an NLRB judge finds UPS violated federal labor law, Tennessee bans noncompetes for certain workers, and Colorado passes a bill limiting the use of AI to set prices and wages.
On Friday, Administrative Law Judge Keltner W. Locke at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found that the United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) violated federal labor law when it denied certain employees pay raises they were otherwise entitled to while the workers decided whether to join a union. Ordering the company to pay the employees the raises they would have received, Judge Locke found that UPS “denied these employees pay raises because of the upcoming election which resulted from their protected union activities.” Changing wages or benefits in the midst of union organizing efforts can be considered an unfair labor practice. Ironically, the situation arose after the company announced its intent to withhold raises to avoid unfair labor practice liability, but Judge Locke ultimately found that UPS failed to provide workers the “necessary assurances that they would receive the pay increases after the election, and regardless of the election’s outcome.”
On Friday, it was reported that Tennessee had banned noncompete agreements for workers earning less than $70,000 per year, and any prior such agreements subject to that income threshold will be voided. The law also directs courts to consider two-year restrictions for workers above that amount a “reasonable” time, empowering the judiciary to modify agreements as necessary to make them enforceable. The new law is part of a growing movement amongst states to restrict covenants in favor of labor market mobility, with at least ten other states having similar policies in place.
On Thursday, the Colorado legislature officially passed HB 26-1210, titled “Prohibit Surveillance Price & Wage Setting,” intended to curb the use of artificial intelligence to set prices and wages in the state. The bill specifically targets “surveillance pricing” and “algorithmic wage discrimination,” which advocates say are used to increase prices and decrease wages. To prevent this manipulation, the bill bans the use of personal characteristics such as genetic data, online behavior history, and biometric information from algorithmic consideration. The bill has some exceptions which hope to prevent adverse effects on customer loyalty or discount programs, as well as clearing the way for employers to use AI in determining compensation based on worker performance with the employee’s awareness. HB 26-1210 now heads to the desk of Governor Jared Polis.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
June 24
NYC primary vies for union support; NLRB ruling tees up Cemex challenge; Sixth Circuit deals blow to NLRB policymaking.
June 23
The Supreme Court declines review of a taxpayer lawsuit against a teacher union's paid leave policy; Congressional Democrats oppose Labor Department's proposed joint employer rule.
June 22
Pro-labor candidate wins DC mayoral primary; Department of Labor secures court order regarding back wages.
June 21
The Bolivian government declares a state of emergency in response to union-led protests, and hotel workers in Philadelphia strike amidst World Cup celebrations.
June 19
The Supreme Court declines to hear a challenge to a Ninth Circuit decision upholding Thryv remedies, and tech workers receive mixed messaging about AI use.
June 18
Teamsters re-elect Sean O'Brien; Teamsters and DOJ move to end federal monitorship.