Maddy Joseph is a student at Harvard Law School.
This week, President Trump endorsed legislation that would halve legal immigration to the United States in the next decade, by drastically reducing the number of immigrants admitted because of family ties. Although the number admitted based on jobs skills would remain steady at around 140,000, the legislation would award merit-based green cards using a points system that looks at education, job offers, and “entrepreneurial initiative,” among other factors.
Trump, his Labor Secretary, and the legislation’s Senate sponsors claimed the changes were needed in part to stop immigrant workers from taking American workers’ jobs and lowering American workers’ wages. But economists question whether reducing immigration leads to more or higher-paying jobs. As the New York Times puts it:
“[E]conomists say . . . that there is no clear connection between less immigration and more jobs for Americans. Rather, the prevailing view among economists is that immigration increases economic growth, improving the lives of the immigrants and the lives of the people who are already here.”
Workers at a Mississippi Nissan plant continue to vote today on whether to unionize. The organizing campaign at the plant, where the majority of workers are African-American, began in 2012, and, as the New York Times characterizes it, has “bitterly divided” workers along racial and other lines. It has also elicited intense opposition from Nissan. As we’ve previously noted, the Mississippi plant is one of the few Nissan plants worldwide where workers are not unionized. Last Friday, the NLRB issued a complaint against the company, which included the charge that Nissan had illegally told workers that the plant might close if they voted to unionize. The voting ends today.
The Senate voted 50-48 to put Trump nominee Marvin Kaplan on the NLRB. With Kaplan’s confirmation, the Board becomes evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
August 10
Employee sues for a fossil-fuel-free 401(k) plan as a religious accommodation; DHS submits a proposed rule eliminating 60-day grace period for H-1B workers; Eighth Circuit dismisses constitutional challenge to the FMSHRC.
August 7
Starbucks beats claims it denied shifts to union workers; Center for State Labor Innovation aims to address labor law shortcomings.
August 6
Taylor Farms faces scrutiny over labor practices; Bipartisan labor bill gains momentum.
August 5
Clash over potential change to Canada’s labor code; Harvard’s Center for Labor and a Just Economy releases model sectoral bargaining laws; NJ sues Amazon for antitrust violations.
August 4
WestJet reaches a deal to end a flight attendant strike; the NLRB rules Whole Foods legally banned Black Lives Matter display; a commentary argues college athletes should have the right to collectively bargain.
August 3
Queens College faculty stage protest; UAW holds presidential debate; the Protect College Sports Act gets new life.