Ajayan Williamson is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, Starbucks workers vote to authorize a strike; the Sixth Circuit rejects Thryv remedies; and OPEIU tries to intervene, again, to defend the NLRB.
Yesterday, Starbucks Workers United announced that its members have voted to authorize an strike if a contract is not finalized by November 13. Contract talks have been in progress since late last year; the union voted down a potential deal in April, seeking concessions on hours, pay, and the outstanding unfair labor practice charges. Yesterday’s vote authorizes an open-ended strike beginning on “Red Cup Day,” the start of the company’s busy holiday season. However, the union represents only about 9,000 of the company’s 200,000 workers, and the company claimed it would be able to keep most stores open “regardless of the union’s plans.”
Meanwhile, the Sixth Circuit ruled yesterday that the NLRB may not order a company to pay for the “direct or foreseeable pecuniary harms” of an unfair labor practice, rejecting the “Thryv remedy” that the Board had imposed. As Ted and I have written, the Third and Fifth Circuits recently rejected Thryv remedies, but the Ninth Circuit recently reaffirmed them. This latest ruling — which also happens to involve allegations of unfair labor practices by Starbucks — contributes to a growing circuit split over the propriety of such remedies.
Finally, the Office and Professional Employees International Union (OPEIU) announced yesterday that it would attempt to seek certiorari in SpaceX’s suit against the NLRB. As Anjali explained in August, the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in that case effectively halted unfair labor practice charges in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. The NLRB announced last month that it would not appeal the decision; in a complex procedural posture, OPEIU was previously allowed to intervene and argue the case, but it was ejected from the proceeding by the Fifth Circuit a few months later. The latest motion directly asks the Supreme Court to allow OPEIU to intervene again and appeal the Fifth Circuit’s decision.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
April 24
NYC unions urge Mamdani to veto anti-protest “buffer zones” bill; 40,000 unionized Samsung workers rally for higher pay; and Labubu Dolls found to contain cotton made by forced labor.
April 23
Trump administration wins in 11th Circuit defending a Biden-era project labor agreement rule; NABTU convenes its annual legislative conference; Meta reported to cut over 10% of its workforce this year.
April 22
Congress introduces a labor rights notification bill; New York's ban on credit checks in hiring takes effect; Harvard's graduate student workers go on strike.
April 21
Trump's labor secretary resigns; NYC doormen avoid a strike; UNITE HERE files complaint over ICE concerns at FIFA World Cup
April 20
Immigrant truckers file federal lawsuit; NLRB rejects UFCW request to preserve victory; NTEU asks federal judge to review CFPB plan to slash staff.
April 19
Chicago Teachers’ Union reach May Day agreement; New York City doormen win tentative deal; MLBPA fires two more executives.