Gurtaran Johal is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, two federal agencies violate a federal court order that paused the mass layoffs of federal workers; Walmart terminates some jobs in Florida following Supreme Court rulings on the legal status of migrants; and Los Angeles firefighters receive a $9.5 million settlement from a federal court case arguing that the city did not pay firefighters during shift changes.
Bloomberg Law reports that the U.S. State Department and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, as the American Federation of Government Employees and other unions contend, have continued to participate in the mass layoffs of federal employees, despite a federal court order halting President Trump’s executive order to implement these drastic layoffs. The unions filed an urgent request for a status conference before Judge Susan Illston of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to resolve the dispute. Judge Illston had previously issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting federal agencies from engaging with these mass firings. Counsel for the government argues that the agencies’ conduct does not violate the preliminary injunction because they took action following a directive from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, not in response to the executive order. The unions have requested that the status conference occur by the end of the week.
Meanwhile, Walmart Inc. notified migrant workers in at least two stores in Florida that they would lose their positions without proper work authorization. This move comes after the Supreme Court ruling that ended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for 350,000 Venezuelans migrants. TPS formerly allowed these migrants to legally work in the United States. Walt Disney Co. also notified Florida-based employees without legal residency that they would lose their positions. These job cuts are a potential indicator of the future challenges that migrant workers will face under the Trump Administration.
Lastly, Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California approved a $9.5 million settlement for firefighters in Los Angeles who argued that they were not paid in full for up to an hour and a half of work during shift changes. Specifically, due to staffing shortages, firefighters often worked beyond their shift. The settlement agreement includes $2.3 million in attorneys’ fees and $16,000 in litigation costs for the plaintiffs. This approval comes approximately a month after the city of Los Angeles and the firefighters initially reached the $9.5 million settlement.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 21
In today’s News and Commentary, the Seventh Circuit raises the bar for the NLRB to obtain preliminary injunctions, the California Primary Care Association sues SEIU-UHW for racketeering, and the Seventh Circuit finds that an employer group and think tank do not have standing to challenge an Illinois law banning captive audience meetings. On Friday, the […]
September 20
Culinary Workers Union members protests union leadership; lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft reveal internal concerns about the threat of AI training to human labor.
September 17
Unions push to block Google from buying Spirit Airlines employment records; U.S. Department of Labor sues Oklahoma coffee chain over alleged wage violations.
September 16
Trump nominates Catherine Eschbach as EEOC general counsel; NLRB declines to resolve union work-assignment dispute; Allina Health physicians begin four-day strike.
September 15
Documents reveal the inner workings of Amazon's union avoidance program; Washington state public sector unions reach tentative deals amid a difficult bargaining cycle; hundreds of Nevada Culinary Union members protest their union's health care changes.
September 14
NCAA and Big Ten file motion to dismiss in former star player's NIL suit; Seventh Circuit rules against former postal worker in discrimination suit.