Gurtaran Johal is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, two federal agencies violate a federal court order that paused the mass layoffs of federal workers; Walmart terminates some jobs in Florida following Supreme Court rulings on the legal status of migrants; and Los Angeles firefighters receive a $9.5 million settlement from a federal court case arguing that the city did not pay firefighters during shift changes.
Bloomberg Law reports that the U.S. State Department and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, as the American Federation of Government Employees and other unions contend, have continued to participate in the mass layoffs of federal employees, despite a federal court order halting President Trump’s executive order to implement these drastic layoffs. The unions filed an urgent request for a status conference before Judge Susan Illston of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to resolve the dispute. Judge Illston had previously issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting federal agencies from engaging with these mass firings. Counsel for the government argues that the agencies’ conduct does not violate the preliminary injunction because they took action following a directive from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, not in response to the executive order. The unions have requested that the status conference occur by the end of the week.
Meanwhile, Walmart Inc. notified migrant workers in at least two stores in Florida that they would lose their positions without proper work authorization. This move comes after the Supreme Court ruling that ended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for 350,000 Venezuelans migrants. TPS formerly allowed these migrants to legally work in the United States. Walt Disney Co. also notified Florida-based employees without legal residency that they would lose their positions. These job cuts are a potential indicator of the future challenges that migrant workers will face under the Trump Administration.
Lastly, Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California approved a $9.5 million settlement for firefighters in Los Angeles who argued that they were not paid in full for up to an hour and a half of work during shift changes. Specifically, due to staffing shortages, firefighters often worked beyond their shift. The settlement agreement includes $2.3 million in attorneys’ fees and $16,000 in litigation costs for the plaintiffs. This approval comes approximately a month after the city of Los Angeles and the firefighters initially reached the $9.5 million settlement.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
August 7
Starbucks beats claims it denied shifts to union workers; Center for State Labor Innovation aims to address labor law shortcomings.
August 6
Taylor Farms faces scrutiny over labor practices; Bipartisan labor bill gains momentum.
August 5
Clash over potential change to Canada’s labor code; Harvard’s Center for Labor and a Just Economy releases model sectoral bargaining laws; NJ sues Amazon for antitrust violations.
August 4
WestJet reaches a deal to end a flight attendant strike; the NLRB rules Whole Foods legally banned Black Lives Matter display; a commentary argues college athletes should have the right to collectively bargain.
August 3
Queens College faculty stage protest; UAW holds presidential debate; the Protect College Sports Act gets new life.
August 2
WestJet flight attendants go on strike, and the American Federation of Government Employees challenges another VA attempt to terminate its collective bargaining agreement.