
Henry Green is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, U.S. and Nippon Steel file lawsuits to revive their merger, a proposal for the EEOC to collect data on pay gaps faces headwinds under the Trump administration, and a second Texas judge rejects a DOL rule expanding overtime protections.
After President Biden blocked their merger last week (as Anjali noted on Friday), U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel are suing the U.S. government in an attempt to revive the deal. The suit, filed in federal court in Washington, D.C., accuses Biden of improperly using his national security powers. The companies filed separate suits against Cleveland-Cliffs, an American steel company that previously tried to buy U.S. Steel, and against the president of the United Steelworkers. The New York Times called the lawsuits a “long-shot maneuver.” The U.S. Steel-Nippon merger is the ninth foreign transaction to be blocked by a president since 1990, according to the Congressional Research Service. Seven of the nine occurred in the last decade.
A proposal by Democrats on the EEOC to require large businesses to annually submit pay data broken down by race, sex, ethnicity, and job category is unlikely to survive under the Trump Administration. In a few weeks, the commission will switch to a Republican chair, who is expected to bring a deregulatory agenda, although Democrats will maintain majority voting power at the commission due to staggered terms. The Biden administration had difficulty enacting the rule because of the staggered terms, which meant Democrats did not have a majority on the commission until July 2023. The administration added the pay disclosure proposal to its spring 2024 regulatory agenda, but likely counted on winning the election in November to enact the proposal, according to a former DOL official.
A second federal district court in Texas has rejected a DOL rule that would expand overtime protections to 4 million new workers. Judge Sam Cummings of the Northern District of Texas held last week that the rule went beyond the DOL’s authority under federal law. The decision comes after a judge in the Eastern District of Texas blocked the rule nationwide in November. The DOL has since appealed that ruling to the 5th Circuit. The challenged rule, released in April, would raise the threshold for how much workers can earn while still being eligible for mandatory overtime and would override provisions in the Fair Labor Standards Act that exempt certain white-collar workers from overtime requirements.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 4
The DOL scraps a Biden-era proposed rule to end subminimum wages for disabled workers; millions will lose access to Medicaid and SNAP due to new proof of work requirements; and states step up in the noncompete policy space.
July 3
California compromises with unions on housing; 11th Circuit rules against transgender teacher; Harvard removes hundreds from grad student union.
July 2
Block, Nanda, and Nayak argue that the NLRA is under attack, harming democracy; the EEOC files a motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by former EEOC Commissioner Jocelyn Samuels; and SEIU Local 1000 strikes an agreement with the State of California to delay the state's return-to-office executive order for state workers.
July 1
In today’s news and commentary, the Department of Labor proposes to roll back minimum wage and overtime protections for home care workers, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by public defenders over a union’s Gaza statements, and Philadelphia’s largest municipal union is on strike for first time in nearly 40 years. On Monday, the U.S. […]
June 30
Antidiscrimination scholars question McDonnell Douglas, George Washington University Hospital bargained in bad faith, and NY regulators defend LPA dispensary law.
June 29
In today’s news and commentary, Trump v. CASA restricts nationwide injunctions, a preliminary injunction continues to stop DOL from shutting down Job Corps, and the minimum wage is set to rise in multiple cities and states. On Friday, the Supreme Court held in Trump v. CASA that universal injunctions “likely exceed the equitable authority that […]