Hannah Finnie is a writer in Washington, D.C. interested in the intersections of work and culture. She is a graduate of Harvard Law School.
Staff at Wirecutter, a product review site owned by the New York Times, say they will go on strike over Black Friday if they don’t reach an agreement with Times management beforehand. They’ve been bargaining with management for two years for their first contract. On Thursday, the Wirecutter Union announced that not only had Times management failed to respond to the union’s most recent proposal, they also rejected the nine proposed bargaining sessions the union offered. Moving forward, the union is asking that if it is unable to reach an agreement with management before Black Friday, readers support them by not shopping through Wirecutter from Black Friday through Cyber Monday.
In other strike news, members of the Museum of Fine Arts (MFA) Union voted overwhelmingly (96%) to authorize a strike on November 17. The union has asked people to support their efforts by picketing the museum, one of the largest art museums in Boston and in the country, on November 17. The vote authorizes the union to go on strike for one day.
Here at Harvard, HGSU-UAW, one of multiple unions on campus, said it will go on strike again next week. The union, which represents around 5,000 student workers, went on strike in late October after negotiations with Harvard management stalled. The union’s demands have remained consistent since then: real recourse for student survivors of sexual harassment and violence; making HGSU-UAW an agency shop (meaning everyone who benefits from the union will have to pay dues to support it); and raises that keep up with increases in the cost of living and are real raises. During the strike in October, the university emailed student workers who withheld their labor asking them to report it to the school, likely so that the school could withhold pay for that time. That decision drew ire from labor supporters, including Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), who tweeted, alongside a screenshot of the email: “Dear Paul, I’m going to need you to give me a call about this.” Paul Curran is the director of Harvard’s Office of Labor and Employee Relations and sent the email to students about returning wages. The union says it hasn’t received a proposal from the university since October 21, over three weeks ago.
Finally, a new study using computational analysis to evaluate Republican economic speeches found that from the Jim Crow era until now, segregationist language and ideology has become more and more associated with Republican economic speeches. The study analyzes speeches from the Congressional Record, finding that Republican economic speeches have shedded overtly racist language but have continued to use abstract language used in the Jim Crow era to signal racial conservatism.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 16
In today’s news and commentary, the NLRB sues New York, a flight attendant sues United, and the Third Circuit considers the employment status of Uber drivers The NLRB sued New York to block a new law that would grant the state authority over private-sector labor disputes. As reported on recently by Finlay, the law, which […]
September 15
Unemployment claims rise; a federal court hands victory to government employees union; and employers fire workers over social media posts.
September 14
Workers at Boeing reject the company’s third contract proposal; NLRB Acting General Counsel William Cohen plans to sue New York over the state’s trigger bill; Air Canada flight attendants reject a tentative contract.
September 12
Zohran Mamdani calls on FIFA to end dynamic pricing for the World Cup; the San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement opens a probe into Scale AI’s labor practices; and union members organize immigration defense trainings.
September 11
California rideshare deal advances; Boeing reaches tentative agreement with union; FTC scrutinizes healthcare noncompetes.
September 10
A federal judge denies a motion by the Trump Administration to dismiss a lawsuit led by the American Federation of Government Employees against President Trump for his mass layoffs of federal workers; the Supreme Court grants a stay on a federal district court order that originally barred ICE agents from questioning and detaining individuals based on their presence at a particular location, the type of work they do, their race or ethnicity, and their accent while speaking English or Spanish; and a hospital seeks to limit OSHA's ability to cite employers for failing to halt workplace violence without a specific regulation in place.