Rund Khayyat is a student at Harvard Law School.
Today the U.S. began a historic vaccine rollout, with the first three million doses going to high-risk health care workers and nursing home residents around the country. Hospitals in all 50 states rushed to set up injection sites as shipments of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine began arriving at hospitals this morning. 145 sites are set to receive the vaccine on Monday, 425 on Tuesday and 66 on Wednesday. The shipments have brought many workers a reason for optimism as virus rates continue to rise steadily and the nation’s death toll nears 300,000.
The next hurdle for hospitals is to rapidly vaccinate millions of doctors, nurses, and other at-risk health workers such as janitors, food handlers, and security guards — and then to do it all over again for the second round of doses in three weeks. Moreover, the first, limited delivery of vaccinations is not enough to serve all of the healthcare workers who are exposed to the virus every day. And, because the vaccine is expected to cause side effects like fevers and aches, hospitals must stagger vaccination schedules among workers. The George Washington University Hospital, for instance, chose to prioritize vaccine distributions on Monday using an algorithm based on its workers’ ages, underlying health conditions, and extent of virus exposure at work.
Though many hospitals are not currently mandating staff to receive the vaccine, some health care workers, and particularly those of color, are worried about getting it so soon. The Detroit Free Press Newspaper, for instance, revealed that some Michigan nurses are concerned about whether enough research has been done on the vaccine’s effects on minority communities. One nurse, who is Black, told the paper that the nurses’ concerns have been “voiced in several different meetings with upper management [in the Henry Ford Health System], with the CEOs and the president: they’re fully aware that nursing staff feels as though they don’t want to be somebody’s science experiment, or a guinea pig.”
A September survey by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that “63% of health care personnel reported that they would be likely to get a COVID-19 vaccine….,” and another survey of nurses in October found that “63% were confident a COVID-19 vaccine will be safe and effective, while 34% would voluntarily receive COVID-19 vaccine if not required.”
Workers’ concerns reveal a critical weakness in the American at-will employment system. Numerous legal blogs have begun publishing articles informing American workers, the vast majority of whom work “at-will,” meaning they can be fired at any time for any reason, that employers can, indeed, mandate the vaccination. National Law Review, for example, analogized to the law surrounding the flu vaccine and pointed out that, in the absence of state or federal law to the contrary, employers may require employees to get vaccinated from the flu. However, the Equal Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has emphasized that an employee may be exempt from a mandatory vaccine if the employee has a disability covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) that prevents them from taking the vaccine. Additionally, an employee may be excused from the vaccine mandate under the religious accommodation provision of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
After the first round of vaccines goes to health-care workers, the federal rollout plan designates the subsequent wave of vaccine rollouts to essential workers needed to maintain basic services. This group, named “1B,” spans professions including grocery-store workers, bus drivers, teachers and utility workers. Leaders of other essential industries are now competing to convince public health workers that their workers are more essential than others in keeping the economy running, while facing high exposure risks, in order to receive priority access to the shots. This is a story to continue watching over the next few weeks, because state governors have the final say on which American workers receive vaccine doses — meaning the priority line could vary widely by state.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
October 16
Department of Labor reduces wage-and-hour enforcement at unionized workplaces; Fain's victory poses question of federal monitor's extension.
October 15
New reporting examines the rollback of child labor protections; California tries to block a strike; NLRB charges Wisconsin mental health provider with firing workers during union drive.
October 14
Eleventh Circuit overturns ERISA exhaustion rule; DHS finalizes removal of automatic renewal for work permits; AFGE challenges SSA over flexible scheduling policy.
October 13
Chicago hotel workers remain on strike; a coalition of Democratic states sues the Labor Department over canceled unemployment insurance grants; the Federal Labor Relations Authority establishes a new mediation framework for federal worker disputes.
October 12
Workers at the Obama Foundation begin organizing; MLB submits its latest collective bargaining agreement proposal; Brigham & Women's nurses postpone strike.
October 11
UAW President Shawn Fain succeeds in his reelection bid, and Spanish unions call for a general strike.