Fred Wang is a student at Harvard Law School.
Happy Labor Day! For more on the origins of this federal holiday celebrating workers, see Kevin’s weekend post, which provides a helpful backgrounder.
There’s much reason for optimism this Labor Day. Union momentum and public support for unions are surging — a historic trend largely driven by young workers across the country. In short, Rani Molla recaps on Vox’s Recode, “unions are winning again.”
But we’d “have more to look forward to,” Steven Greenhouse writes in the Washington Post, if corporations and courts didn’t make it so hard to unionize in the first place. As the past few months of union busting have made clear, employers often take serious measures to interfere with and suppress union-organizing efforts. This “routine silencing of workers who seek to form a union or enforce their workplace rights,” Terri Gerstein argues in the American Prospect, poses “the most prevalent form of cancellation in our society” — despite what the loudest “cancel culture” opponents will tell you.
President Biden promised to oversee the “most pro-union” administration in U.S. history. And he’s taken steps towards making good on that promise. But as the November midterm elections near, Biden’s track record might not be enough to win over blue-collar voters, Katia Dmitrieva and Jordan Fabian report over at Bloomberg. Many workers are dismayed at the administration’s “failure to deliver on campaign promises such as a federal minimum wage hike.” Labor reform initiatives such as the PRO Act have stalled in Congress. “The lack of enthusiasm,” the authors note, “holds gloomy implications” for the Democratic Party come November — and demonstrate just “how hard it will be for Democrats to rebuild their deep historic ties with union voters.”
Finally, Ben has an article published in The Supreme Court Review covering Cedar Point Nursery, a 2021 Supreme Court decision holding that the government must pay employers before requiring them to admit union organizers onto company property.
In the piece, Ben argues that the decision was wrong on its own terms. To justify its holding, Cedar Point maintained that union-access regulations — unlike, say, “standard health and safety inspections” — were “not germane” to “any risk posed to the public.”
This argument, Ben shows, ignores what labor law actually does. The challenged union-access provision for farmworkers, for instance, was a “direct response to widespread violence that [had] engulfed California farms.” And by “facilitating unionization,” union-access rights also “facilitated collective bargaining agreements that contained a robust system of safety and health measures,” such as “pesticide protection measures.” In other words, the regulation too served public health and safety ends.
An excerpt of the introduction is up on the blog, and OnLabor readers can access the full article for free (for thirty days) here.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
August 30
Seattle teachers vote to authorize a strike days before the school year begins; BNSF Railway’s AI dispatching system puts workers in danger; and a California court finds that the DOL’s pay cuts for non-citizen farmworkers are unlawful.
August 28
Calls for a “token tax” on AI consumption grow and the number of Amazon workers on federal aid explodes.
August 27
NLRB GC targets Biden-era precedent; Starbucks Workers United calls for boycott; Encore Boston Harbor workers authorize strike
August 26
Trump administration proposes $103,000 H-1B visa fee after court blocks earlier attempt; Illinois governor signs law enabling state investment in AFL-CIO housing trust; Deloitte pays $21.5 million to settle DOJ probe alleging DEI-related discrimination in federal contracts.
August 25
Hyundai workers reach a tentative agreement; Federal-sector unions sue the Trump Administration over OPM rule changes; Federal judge dismisses a teachers’ union free speech suit.
August 24
Boeing engineers and technicians reject contract proposals and authorize a strike; Ninth Circuit holds that unions charged under 8(b)(4)(D) cannot invoke the work-preservation defense to disregard 10(k) determination.