
Jon Levitan is a student at Harvard Law School and a member of the Labor and Employment Lab.
Uber is using the COVID-19 pandemic to try to persuade the federal government to adopt its position that its drivers are not employees under labor and employment law. In a letter sent to President Trump and other political leaders, Uber CEO Dana Khosrowshahi requested federal assistance for drivers who have lost work due to the pandemic but spent half of the letter explaining why Uber believes the dichotomy between independent contractors and employees is problematic. Khosrowshahi urged the government to create a new worker classification: a “‘third way’ that would update our labor laws to remove the forced choice between flexibility and protection for millions of American workers.” Of course, his letter never suggests that Uber drivers already are employees and are simply misclassified by Uber as independent contractors. Avoiding having its drivers classified as employees is a top priority for Uber, especially after the passage of AB5 in California last year.
HuffPost published a comprehensive and detailed FAQ for applying for unemployment insurance, a system that will be increasingly relied on as one estimate projects 3 million workers will lose their jobs by summer. The guide details the nuts and bolts on the program like when to apply, how to do so, and what to do if the website crashes from overuse – as has happened in multiple states including New Jersey. It also answers whether undocumented workers are eligible for unemployment insurance (if the worker is a recipient of DACA, maybe, but otherwise no), and whether workers classified as independent contractors by their employers should apply (yes, the state administering the program determines the classification, not the employer).
Courtney wrote a couple weeks ago that Michael Bloomberg’s presidential campaign had fired former employees despite explicit promises that it would employ them through the November general election, regardless of whether or not Bloomberg was the nominee. Now, the former employees have sued the campaign on two related counts in a class action representing up to 2,000 former employees. The former employees allege the Bloomberg campaign induced them to work for the campaign by lying to them about the stability of their employment, and that they should be compensated for lost wages from other potential jobs that they missed out on when they relied on the promise. They also seek punitive damages.
In the midst of widespread closures of bars and restaurants for on-site service due to the pandemic, customers are turning to take-out and delivery to support their favorite establishments in difficult circumstances. Carbone, a Michelin-starred, red gravy Italian restaurant in Manhattan which recently added a delivery option, has been immensely popular, as quarantine New Yorkers crave $69 veal parmesan. So many orders were placed that delivery workers crowded the sidewalk outside the restaurant, creating such an unsafe situation that the police broke up the crowd. One officer was quoted screaming to the workers as he forced them to disperse, “I know you guys are just out here trying to make money…I personally don’t give a sh**!”
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
June 2
Proposed budgets for DOL and NLRB show cuts on the horizon; Oregon law requiring LPAs in cannabis dispensaries struck down.
June 1
In today’s news and commentary, the Ninth Circuit upholds a preliminary injunction against the Trump Administration, a federal judge vacates parts of the EEOC’s pregnancy accommodation rules, and video game workers reach a tentative agreement with Microsoft. In a 2-1 decision issued on Friday, the Ninth Circuit upheld a preliminary injunction against the Trump Administration […]
May 30
Trump's tariffs temporarily reinstated after brief nationwide injunction; Louisiana Bill targets payroll deduction of union dues; Colorado Supreme Court to consider a self-defense exception to at-will employment
May 29
AFGE argues termination of collective bargaining agreement violates the union’s First Amendment rights; agricultural workers challenge card check laws; and the California Court of Appeal reaffirms San Francisco city workers’ right to strike.
May 28
A proposal to make the NLRB purely adjudicatory; a work stoppage among court-appointed lawyers in Massachusetts; portable benefits laws gain ground
May 27
a judge extends a pause on the Trump Administration’s mass-layoffs, the Fifth Circuit refuses to enforce an NLRB order, and the Texas Supreme court extends workplace discrimination suits to co-workers.