Vail Kohnert-Yount is a student at Harvard Law School.
The Massachusetts House voted on Tuesday to pass a bill requiring companies seeking large state and local government contracts to disclose workplace safety violations. The bill is a response to the 2016 deaths of two workers, Kelvin Mattocks and Robert Higgins, in a trench collapse at a Boston construction site. While the company, Atlantic Drain Services, and its owner, Kevin Otto, face charges of manslaughter, a federal investigation found the company had previously been cited for numerous OSHA violations and violated 18 different regulations leading up to the collapse. Boston subsequently enacted an ordinance that requires city contractors to disclose OSHA violations and for applicants with “a history of engaging in unsafe, hazardous or dangerous practices” to be denied permits. The House bill would not automatically deny contracts to violators, but it would make violations part of the review for contract awards. It remains to be seen whether the Senate will vote on the bill before the formal legislative session ends on Tuesday.
The California Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that Starbucks and other employers in California must pay hourly workers for the time they spend off the clock on tasks including closing the store, setting an alarm, and locking the door. Starbucks employee Douglas Troester’s lawsuit, in which he argued he was entitled to be paid for the time he spent closing the store after he had clocked out, was initially rejected by a U.S. District Court on the grounds that it was minimal. Ultimately, the California Supreme Court said the cumulative effect of denying employees’ pay for a few extra minutes of work each day was significant. “That is enough to pay a utility bill, buy a week of groceries, or cover a month of bus fares,” Associate Justice Goodwin Liu wrote. “What Starbucks calls ‘de minimis‘ is not de minimis at all to many ordinary people who work for hourly wages.”
Disneyland workers called off a planned four-day protest in Anaheim, California, after reaching a tentative agreement with Disney management to improve wages and benefits for resort employees. Workers, including custodians, ride operators, and restaurant staff, had been preparing for “Shantyland,” a demonstrated described by SEIU-United Service Workers West as “an interactive encampment featuring displays that reveal the hard truth about how Disneyland treats employees and helps create poverty and homelessness throughout Orange County and the Anaheim area.” On Monday, a coalition of four unions representing Disneyland employees reached a tentative agreement with the Disneyland Resort, and instead workers are cautiously celebrating their victory.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors is considering banning companies from offering their workers free meals, a common practice in the tech industry, as local restaurants complain about a lack of business. The ordinance wouldn’t apply retroactively to existing employee cafeterias, but instead to new construction in the city, and is backed by restaurant industry lobbying groups like the Golden Gate Restaurant Association. A similar ordinance has already been enacted in nearby Mountain View, exemplifying the growing tension between large tech companies and their surrounding communities.
Marisa Franco, co-founder of Mijente, a national Latinx organizing network, penned an op-ed in The Guardian yesterday asking employees in the tech industry to “unite to defeat America’s deportation machine.” Employees of Microsoft, Salesforce, and Amazon are protesting their employer’s contracts with agencies including ICE, CBP, and DHS, following in the footsteps of Google employees who successfully pressured their employer to cut its contract with the Pentagon to use artificial intelligence to help drone warfare. While tech companies continue to defend their work, Franco encouraged their employees to continue their activism, saying that the Google campaign worked because of “the magnitude and consistency of internal pressure that finally got the company to abandon its amoral work.”
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
June 30
Antidiscrimination scholars question McDonnell Douglas, George Washington University Hospital bargained in bad faith, and NY regulators defend LPA dispensary law.
June 29
In today’s news and commentary, Trump v. CASA restricts nationwide injunctions, a preliminary injunction continues to stop DOL from shutting down Job Corps, and the minimum wage is set to rise in multiple cities and states. On Friday, the Supreme Court held in Trump v. CASA that universal injunctions “likely exceed the equitable authority that […]
June 27
Labor's role in Zohran Mamdani's victory; DHS funding amendment aims to expand guest worker programs; COSELL submission deadline rapidly approaching
June 26
A district judge issues a preliminary injunction blocking agencies from implementing Trump’s executive order eliminating collective bargaining for federal workers; workers organize for the reinstatement of two doctors who were put on administrative leave after union activity; and Lamont vetoes unemployment benefits for striking workers.
June 25
Some circuits show less deference to NLRB; 3d Cir. affirms return to broader concerted activity definition; changes to federal workforce excluded from One Big Beautiful Bill.
June 24
In today’s news and commentary, the DOL proposes new wage and hour rules, Ford warns of EV battery manufacturing trouble, and California reaches an agreement to delay an in-person work mandate for state employees. The Trump Administration’s Department of Labor has advanced a series of proposals to update federal wage and hour rules. First, the […]