Anjali Katta is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, the DOL proposes new wage and hour rules, Ford warns of EV battery manufacturing trouble, and California reaches an agreement to delay an in-person work mandate for state employees.
The Trump Administration’s Department of Labor has advanced a series of proposals to update federal wage and hour rules. First, the DOL appears to be proposing changes to child labor laws including limitations on working hours and the types of work children can engage in. Under the current rule, for example, minors have restricted work hours, particularly during the school year and are unable to work in hazardous occupations, such as mining. Second, the DOL is proposing to reconsider the application of the Fair Labor Standards Act to domestic service. Finally, the DOL is proposing a rescission of the ‘Dual Jobs’ provision, a rule that explains when a tip-earning employee’s non-tipped job duties are not considered part of the ‘tipped’ occupation and instead must be paid full minimum wage. Details of these proposals will become clearer pending review.
Ford Motor Company, which has invested heavily in EV and EV battery manufacturing over the last few years, has intensified its campaign to save EV manufacturing subsidies and tax credits that are in peril under President Trump’s proposed budget bill. EV manufacturers like Ford, have sought to benefit from the Inflation Reduction Act’s production tax credit known as 45X. The credit allows eligible clean energy manufacturers to gain either cash payments or a transferrable tax credit based on the volume of clean energy components produced. Representatives from Ford expressed concern that without these credits, the company may not be able to create the anticipated number of manufacturing jobs at facilities still under construction, such as a $3 billion EV-battery plant in Detroit. However, even without these credits, Ford still plans on opening and operating the plant after construction is completed.
The State of California has reached an agreement with a union representing the state’s public engineers to delay the governor’s return-to-office mandate until July 2026. The mandate, put forth by Governor Newsom in early March, requires public employees to work in person for four days a week, mirroring President Trump’s directive to require in-person work for federal employees. The Professional Engineers in California Government, the union representing over 10,000 public engineers working for the state, said that it will be dropping its lawsuit and challenges before the California Public Employment Relations Board. Other unions, including SEIU Local 1000, have also challenged the mandate.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 21
In today’s News and Commentary, the Seventh Circuit raises the bar for the NLRB to obtain preliminary injunctions, the California Primary Care Association sues SEIU-UHW for racketeering, and the Seventh Circuit finds that an employer group and think tank do not have standing to challenge an Illinois law banning captive audience meetings. On Friday, the […]
September 20
Culinary Workers Union members protests union leadership; lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft reveal internal concerns about the threat of AI training to human labor.
September 17
Unions push to block Google from buying Spirit Airlines employment records; U.S. Department of Labor sues Oklahoma coffee chain over alleged wage violations.
September 16
Trump nominates Catherine Eschbach as EEOC general counsel; NLRB declines to resolve union work-assignment dispute; Allina Health physicians begin four-day strike.
September 15
Documents reveal the inner workings of Amazon's union avoidance program; Washington state public sector unions reach tentative deals amid a difficult bargaining cycle; hundreds of Nevada Culinary Union members protest their union's health care changes.
September 14
NCAA and Big Ten file motion to dismiss in former star player's NIL suit; Seventh Circuit rules against former postal worker in discrimination suit.