Jason Vazquez is a staff attorney at the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. He graduated from Harvard Law School in 2023. His writing on this blog reflects his personal views and should not be attributed to the Teamsters.
Yesterday, after months of bipartisan negotiations and a grueling weekend of procedural maneuvering, the Senate approved a sweeping $1.2 trillion infrastructure package that will pour hundreds of billions of dollars into rebuilding roads, airports, and railways, upgrading public transit systems, modernizing the power grid, and expanding broadband access.
The legislative success, which some have characterized as the most significant investment in the nation’s infrastructure in decades, appears to vindicate, to some degree, Biden’s campaign posturing that he would prove capable of forging bipartisan consensus in an era of sharp polarization. Yet compromise came at a cost. The GOP managed to extract significant concessions, forcing Democrats to discard the most transformative elements of Biden’s vision to remake the nation’s transit, healthcare, and energy systems. Even so, labor groups voiced support for the package’s passage, which Labor Secretary Marty Walsh described as “great news for workers, families and communities across the nation.”
The bill is projected to pass in the House, though it may encounter resistance. Several members of the Progressive Caucus have indicated that they intend to withhold support for the measure until the Senate approves the separate “big, bold” $3.5 trillion domestic spending package that would reshape the nation’s social safety net. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) moved to preempt this yesterday, assuring those concerned the infrastructure package deals insufficiently with economic inequality and climate change that the Senate is “moving on a second track” to “make a generational transformation in those areas.” Indeed, Senate Democrats approved a framework for the budget bill this morning, igniting what is likely to degenerate into a bitter and protracted legislative struggle.
An EPI report released Tuesday finds that compensation for executives at the country’s largest public firms has soared since the neoliberal consensus crystallized in the late 1970s, dramatically eclipsing income growth for even the top wage earners. The study highlights that, strikingly, executive pay continued to climb during the pandemic, even as millions of working people were plunged into precarity. The country’s grotesque economic inequality — the root of so much sociopolitical dysfunction — is no secret. EPI’s report makes clear that it continues to escalate even in this era of intensifying populist energy on both left and right.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
August 19
NLRB swears in third Trump-appointed Member; Teamster file complaint against Amazon in New York; unions and college students sue Trump admin for international student immigration restrictions
August 18
New Trump administration rules will remove the Merit Systems Protection Board's independence; a CFPB union leader suspended alleges retaliation; the National Treasury Employees Union requires its members to pay dues as it battles to stay financially afloat.
August 17
Tensions rise between New York City's teachers' union and City Hall; NLRB judge finds Brooklyn hospital violated labor law.
August 16
New documents show that federal surveillance operations targeted Minnesota labor unions during the ICE surge, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission denies halting federal class discrimination complaints.
August 14
Hollywood unions diverge in response to the Paramount-Warner merger saga; Tesla defeats a years-long strike in Sweden, and labor scholars advocate for state sectoral bargaining policy innovation.
August 13
EEOC complaint process expected to harm federal workers; former UAW leaders endorse Fain challenger; Xbox employees protest layoffs.