After a weekend of slow but steady procedural advances, the Senate is expected to pass the long-awaited compromise infrastructure bill early this week.  As the New York Times explained Monday morning, the bill’s final passage may be delayed until late Monday night unless the chamber can secure unanimous consent to forego the 30 hours of debate required under Senate rules.  As of Monday morning, only one Senator—Bill Hagerty (R-TN)—remained opposed to accelerating the process.  Although the bipartisan bill dispensed with many crucial administration priorities, it nonetheless attracted enthusiastic support from prominent labor organizations, which have found much to like in the bill’s provision for roads, bridges, rail, public transit, and other built infrastructure projects.  Indeed, the past view months have witnessed complementary efforts by both industry and labor groups to advance the legislation.  As President Biden put it after a July 22^nd summit featuring eight labor and business leaders, “it’s both in the interest of business and labor to get this done.”

Elsewhere on Capitol Hill, Senate Democrats released an outline of the American Families Plan (AFP), the $3.5 trillion antipoverty and climate initiative they intend to advance after the August recess.  The American Families Plan, which includes a grab-bag of measures ranging from clean-energy tax incentives to price-reduction policies for prescription drugs to mild immigration reforms, would have to secure unanimous support from the Democratic caucus in the Senate, as no Republican legislators have signaled openness to the wide-ranging package.  In a letter to the caucus shared on Monday morning, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer indicated that the Senate would not adjourn for its August recess until it passed both the bipartisan infrastructure bill and the budget outline for the AFP.

Finally, The American Prospect published a deep look into the legal status, wages, and working conditions of warehouse workers across the country.  Throughout the “archipelago” of warehouses scattered across the continental United States, the Prospect explained, as many as four million workers are paid wages under $20 per hour for backbreaking work that has only become more dangerous as the pandemic has worn on.  Among the many factors driving abusive conditions is warehouse owners’ use of staffing companies to secure contingent, precarious workers who can be classified as “temporary” even as they fill roles indistinguishable from full-time employment.  Because the warehouses do not technically employ these workers, they have no legal obligation (and perceive no moral or fair-dealing obligation) to provide them with benefits or job security. Moreover, under the prevailing interpretation of the NLRA, unionization would be of only limited use, as the warehouse owners would likely not be considered joint employers with a duty to bargain with workers formally employed by a third-party staffing company.  The entire article is worth reading in full—both for its portrait of warehouse labor and its analysis of the legal infrastructure that facilitates such abusive structures.