Lauren Godles is a student at Harvard Law School.
Today, the Department of Labor announced today that the Senate cafeteria workers who were illegally denied wages will receive $1 million dollars in backpay from Restaurant Associates (RA) and its subcontractor, Personnel Plus. The money will be split among 674 employees, though DOL did not specify how much particular individuals will receive. Even a small backpay award or a slight wage increase could mean the difference to some of these workers between needing to work one job or two.
In an official investigation, DOL’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) concluded that RA misclassified the cafeteria workers, in violation of the Service Contract Act. RA was also found to have violated the FLSA. According to the Associated Press, the WHD is considering whether RA should be banned from future government contracts. However, there has been no mention of whether RA’s current contract could be cancelled. Because there is no private right of action under the Service Contract Act, the workers can do nothing more than await DOL’s decision.
According to RA Senior Vice President of Creative Services, Sam Soccaur, the misclassifications occurred due to “administrative technicalities” involving the workers’ “evolving day-to-day work responsibilities.” However, this justification is inconsistent with the nature of the workers’ claims. The workers alleged that despite their work responsibilities not having changed, their titles (and corresponding wages) were downgraded under the new RA contract in December 2015. For example, Betrand Olotara, who had always worked as a “Cook” and always cooked the same foods, was reclassified as a “Food Service Worker”— a lower-paying job whose responsibilities do not include cooking at all, except for toast.
No matter what happens with future RA contracts, now the Senate Cafeteria workers have something to show for their organizing efforts and their low-wage work serving Washington’s elite. Read our previous updates on this topic here and here.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 3
Unions seek a preliminary injunction to prevent USDA downsizing; the D.C. District Court issues a preliminary injunction against new student loan regulations; Matt Bruenig releases an analysis of Starbucks’ ongoing legal battle against Starbucks Workers United.
July 2
First Circuit denies federal worker unions’ mandamus petition; federal court denies preliminary injunction against new union reporting rule; House introduces the Securing Agriculture’s Workforce Act.
July 1
Trump nominates Keith Sonderling as Labor Secretary; DOL eliminates disparate-impact liability from Title VI regulations; OPM finalizes rule allowing suitability-based removal of federal employees for post-appointment conduct.
June 30
SCOTUS ends removal protections for agencies; staff at NYC cocktail bar vote to unionize.
June 29
In today’s News and Commentary, student-athletes file a class action suit challenging the NCAA’s new Age-Based Rule, a federal judge declines to issue a preliminary injunction against FEMA’s reduction in force but expedites proceedings, and Gavin Newsom opposes California’s proposed billionaire tax in favor of a federal approach. On Thursday, DeJuan Campbell, at basketball player […]
June 28
Philadelphia utility workers announce July 4 strike; national parks workers vote to unionize; Michigan considers “right to disconnect” bill.