Anjali Katta is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s News and Commentary, Trump appeals a court-ordered pause on mass layoffs, the Tenth Circuit sidesteps a ruling on the Board’s remedial powers, and an industry group targets Biden-era NLRB decisions.
The Trump administration is asking the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to pause a temporary order blocking the administration from continuing its mass layoff plan for federal workers. As Justin reported, the court issued a two-week pause on the administration’s ability to make changes across twenty agencies. In response, the administration immediately appealed and filed for an emergency stay of the order. It argued that the “sweeping” order obstructs the Executive Branch from implementing the President’s policy priorities. The Trump administration has asked the Ninth Circuit to rule on the motion by May 15.
The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit partially upheld an NLRB decision against two film studios affirming the agency’s authority to order compensation for “all direct and foreseeable pecuniary harms” for striking drivers who were illegally replaced. The Board had used its 2022 Thryv Inc. standard that allows the agency to demand compensation for harms stemming from an employer’s illegal actions. While one appeals court has struck down Thryv Inc. and another upheld it, its future remains uncertain. On Monday, however, the studios failed to properly challenge Thryv Inc. before the Board, so the court declined to consider it. Judge Allison Eid dissented, arguing the relief exceeded the NLRB’s authority.
An industry coalition, the Coalition for a Democratic Workplace (CDW), is urging the NLRB to reverse Biden-era labor precedents by leveraging President Trump’s executive order asserting that the president and the AG have the power to interpret the law for all agencies. CDW asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to direct the NLRB to ignore 15 significant rulings (including 14 that set new precedents), aiming to curb the board’s longstanding independence and to cause a sudden ‘flip-flop’ in Board policy on a mass scale. These board decisions included those that created a new framework for imposing bargaining orders in response to employers’ labor law violations, required companies to reimburse workers for the financial consequences of unfair labor practices, barred management from holding mandatory captive audience meetings, and banned severance agreements that include waivers of NLRA rights. CDW, and the Trump administration are likely to face legal challenges along the way.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 21
In today’s News and Commentary, the Seventh Circuit raises the bar for the NLRB to obtain preliminary injunctions, the California Primary Care Association sues SEIU-UHW for racketeering, and the Seventh Circuit finds that an employer group and think tank do not have standing to challenge an Illinois law banning captive audience meetings. On Friday, the […]
September 20
Culinary Workers Union members protests union leadership; lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft reveal internal concerns about the threat of AI training to human labor.
September 17
Unions push to block Google from buying Spirit Airlines employment records; U.S. Department of Labor sues Oklahoma coffee chain over alleged wage violations.
September 16
Trump nominates Catherine Eschbach as EEOC general counsel; NLRB declines to resolve union work-assignment dispute; Allina Health physicians begin four-day strike.
September 15
Documents reveal the inner workings of Amazon's union avoidance program; Washington state public sector unions reach tentative deals amid a difficult bargaining cycle; hundreds of Nevada Culinary Union members protest their union's health care changes.
September 14
NCAA and Big Ten file motion to dismiss in former star player's NIL suit; Seventh Circuit rules against former postal worker in discrimination suit.