Anjali Katta is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary King Soopers workers announce a strike, Congressman Biggs introduces a bill to abolish OSHA, the UAW announces willingness to support Trump’s tariffs, and Yale New Haven Health System faces a wage and hour class action.
Workers at unionized King Soopers stores, a grocery chain owned by Kroger, are set to begin a ULP strike after over four months of failed contract negotiations that began in October 2024. Around 10,000 workers at 77 locations, represented by UFCW Local 7, will strike for two weeks starting on February 6th. King Soopers workers allege that the company is attempting to force a new contract with worse terms despite issues with staffing and low wages. The overwhelming majority of workers—96%—voted to authorize the strike.
Republican Congressman Andy Biggs has introduced a bill to abolish OSHA. Titled “NOSHA”, the entirety of the bill reads “The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 is repealed. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is abolished.” In his press release, Congressman Biggs stated that OSHA, an agency signed into law by President Nixon, is an example of a “bloated federal government” and “should not have existed in the first place.” Some commentators, however, are skeptical about the bill’s ability to pass the House and the Senate and regard the move as a publicity stunt.
The UAW announced in a statement that they were willing to support President Trump’s tariffs as a means to prevent manufacturing plant closures and curb corporate power that pits “US workers against workers in other countries.” The statement, however, explicitly rejects using these tariffs as leverage for negotiating immigration or drug policies with other nations. Although the UAW had previously advocated against a Trump presidency, the union and its president, Shawn Fain, have previously signaled their interest in working with any administration that prioritizes workers. The statement urges President Trump to renegotiate trade deals such as USMCA and NAFTA to bring back American jobs and stop the exploitation of workers at home and abroad.
Finally, Yale New Haven Health System, Connecticut’s second largest employer with 31,000 employees, is facing a federal lawsuit alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Connecticut Minimum Wage Act. Workers allege that Yale New Haven failed to pay employees for all hours worked, including overtime, and improperly deducted time for breaks that were missed, interrupted, or not fully taken. The lawsuit seeks to recover unpaid regular and overtime wages plus damages for thousands of current and former employees allegedly subject to the improper pay practices.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
March 3
In today’s news and commentary, Texas dismantles their contracting program for minorities, NextEra settles an ERISA lawsuit, and Chipotle beats an age discrimination suit. Texas Acting Comptroller Kelly Hancock is being sued in state court for allegedly unlawfully dismantling the Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) program, a 1990s initiative signed by former Governor George W. Bush […]
March 2
Block lays off over 4,000 workers; H-1B fee data is revealed.
March 1
The NLRB officially rescinds the Biden-era standard for determining joint-employer status; the DOL proposes a rule that would rescind the Biden-era standard for determining independent contractor status; and Walmart pays $100 million for deceiving delivery drivers regarding wages and tips.
February 27
The Ninth Circuit allows Trump to dismantle certain government unions based on national security concerns; and the DOL set to focus enforcement on firms with “outsized market power.”
February 26
Workplace AI regulations proposed in Michigan; en banc D.C. Circuit hears oral argument in CFPB case; white police officers sue Philadelphia over DEI policy.
February 25
OSHA workplace inspections significantly drop in 2025; the Court denies a petition for certiorari to review a Minnesota law banning mandatory anti-union meetings at work; and the Court declines two petitions to determine whether Air Force service members should receive backpay as a result of religious challenges to the now-revoked COVID-19 vaccine mandate.