Maddie Chang is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, Oregon considers a bill to address wage theft in construction, the EEOC brings a discrimination claim against a restaurant on behalf of a transgender employee, and a new Department of Labor survey finds widespread labor violations in the Southern California garment industry.
The Oregon state legislature is considering a bill to address wage theft in the construction industry. House Bill 2057 would make general contractors responsible for their subcontractors’ wage theft, and would allow workers to sue for their wages for up to six years after the work took place. The idea behind the bill is that because general contractors are more established and stable than subcontractors, workers are more likely to recover unpaid wages. General contractors are also in a better position to prevent wage theft in the first instance in their selection of subcontractors. The Oregon Law Center, which testified at the bill hearing further explained: “The tiers of employment make it difficult for workers to reclaim unpaid wages because each tier is free from any liability to the next.” The bill’s third reading is scheduled for today.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is bringing its first claim on behalf of a trans worker since 2017. The suit alleges that T.C. Wheelers Bar & Pizzeria in Tonawanda, New York subjected Quinn J. Gambino, a trans employee, to harassment by misgendering him, asking invasive questions about his body, and making anti-trans comments. The claim is that this harassment amounted to constructively discharging Gambino. In pursuing this case, the EEOC is building on the Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County, which held that discrimination against trans workers violates Title VII. The agency first sought a pre-litigation settlement through the conciliation process. It now brings this suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, Buffalo Division.
Last week, the Department of Labor released the results of a survey of the garment industry in Southern California that found widespread violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). 80 percent of garment manufacturers and contractors surveyed were found in violation of the FLSA. The Department’s Wage and Hour Division also found that in 2022, 32 percent of contractors were paying workers piece-rate wages (paying workers based on the number of garments produced), a practice which became illegal in California at the start of that year. As reported in the LA Times, the survey reported an instance where a contractor paid garment workers as little as $1.58 per hour. Partially in response to these findings, garment workers gathered on Tuesday morning to protest outside the Los Angeles City Council. They were also protesting upcoming zoning decisions that will impact the Garment District.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
March 30
Trump orders payment to TSA agents; NYC doormen look to authorize a strike; and KPMG positions for mass layoffs.
March 29
The Department of Veterans Affairs re-terminates its collective bargaining agreement despite a preliminary injunction, and the Federal Labor Relations Authority announces new rules increasing the influence of political appointees over federal labor relations.
March 27
“Cesar Chavez Day” renamed “Farmworkers Day” in California after investigation finds Chavez engaged in rampant sexual abuse.
March 26
Supreme Court hears oral argument in an FAA case; NLRB rules that Cemex does not impose an enforceable deadline for requesting an election; DOL proposes raising wage standards for H-1B workers.
March 25
UPS rescinded its driver buyout program; California court dismissed a whistleblower retaliation suit against Meta; EEOC announced $15 million settlement to resolve vaccine-related religious discrimination case.
March 24
The WNBPA unanimously votes to ratify the league’s new CBA; NYU professors begin striking; and a district court judge denies the government’s motion to dismiss a case challenging the Trump administration’s mass revocation of international student visas.