Anjali Katta is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, SAG-AFTRA reaches a tentative agreement, AFT sues the Trump Administration, and California offers its mediation services to make up for federal cuts.
SAG-AFTRA, the union representing approximately 133,000 commercial actors and singers, has reached a tentative agreement with advertisers and advertising agencies. These companies were represented in contract negotiations by the Joint Policy Committee, which bargained on their behalf. The new agreement covers union members’ work in advertisements and commercials and comes after several extensions of the previous contract’s expiration date. Details of the agreement will be released following a review by the SAG-AFTRA National Board on April 26. If the board approves the tentative deal, union members will then vote on its ratification.
The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and 10 other unions have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration in an effort to prevent the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS)’s dismantling. FMCS is a federal agency that mediates labor disputes in both public and private sectors and has played a key role in workplace negotiations at companies like Starbucks, Boeing, and Apple. Following the administration’s March 14 executive order, which directed FMCS to significantly downsize, the agency placed 90% of its employees on administrative leave and shut down all of its field offices. The lawsuit alleges that the administration’s actions are unconstitutional and that FMCS’s compliance with the order violates the Administrative Procedure Act.
Relatedly, in response to cuts at the FMCS, California’s State Mediation and Conciliation Service (SMCS) is stepping in and taking cases that would have usually been handled by the federal government. SMCS is part of California’s Public Employment Relations Board (PERB), a state agency that administers labor laws for public employees. FMCS’s abrupt downsizing coincided with contract negotiations at several major California employers, including grocery chains and hospitals, prompting state intervention. Additionally, there have been other efforts to expand PERB’s authority. For example, in January 2025, California lawmakers proposed legislation that would empower PERB to certify union elections and rule on unfair labor practice cases in the private sector if the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) fails to respond in a timely manner.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 9
The Second Circuit declines to vacate an arbitration award over a nursing union dispute; federal workers sue the Department of Defense for termination of union contracts; New York City announces settlement with companies for violating New York work laws.
July 8
DOL plans to make changes to the PERM immigration program; three-day hearing on proposed forced-labor tariffs is underway; Mamdani recovers $2.3M in corporate settlements.
July 7
Former EEOC Commissioner drops her wrongful termination lawsuit following the Supreme Court’s ruling on Presidential removal power; unions sue Department of Defense over cancellation of collective bargaining agreements.
July 6
NY home health worker class action settlement secures preliminary approval; the NLRB upholds order finding Amazon violated federal labor law.
July 3
Unions seek a preliminary injunction to prevent USDA downsizing; the D.C. District Court issues a preliminary injunction against new student loan regulations; Matt Bruenig releases an analysis of Starbucks’ ongoing legal battle against Starbucks Workers United.
July 2
First Circuit denies federal worker unions’ mandamus petition; federal court denies preliminary injunction against new union reporting rule; House introduces the Securing Agriculture’s Workforce Act.