
Maddie Chang is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s Tech@Work, fast food chains introduce AI surveillance systems to encourage “upsizing,” and tech companies defeat child cobalt miners’ forced labor case.
KFC, Taco Bell, and Dairy Queen have begun to use an AI system to monitor worker productivity. As reported in Yahoo!Finance, a system called “Riley” collects audio and video data and allows managers to review employee performance. In particular, the system captures how often employees offer to “upsize” orders or advertise loyalty programs to customers. One of Riley’s case studies on Dairy Queen explains: “Armed with Riley’s reports which provided deeper layers of insights into the employees’ performance and even broken down further into individual performance scores, all backed by video and audio clips for reference…General Managers were listening more intently, coaching and training employees and sharing praise.” A Dairy Queen franchisee quoted by the article said that since introducing the AI system, he’s seen a 3% increase in sales.
Data and Society researcher Alexandra Mateescu noted that the system may be squeezing workplaces that are already severely understaffed. There are a number of additional concerns about the introduction of data-driven surveillance tools into the workplace, including privacy harms to workers and possible discrimination. Separately, emerging research shows that monitoring employees may not even work as intended to boost productivity. Finally, in a 2022 memo, National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo expressed concern that data-driven surveillance systems might interfere with workers’ rights to organize the workplace, in violation of Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act. Her memo notes that employers who use these systems might violate Section 7 “by significantly impairing or negating employees’ ability to engage in protected activity” and by interfering with the ability to do so confidentially.
This week, the US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit dismissed a case brought by child miners against big tech companies Apple, Alphabet, Dell, Microsoft, and Tesla. Reusable batteries that power everything from consumer electronics to electric vehicles use the mineral cobalt, much of which is mined in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (“DRC”). Some of this mining takes place in informal mines, and is done by children working in highly unsafe conditions, under severe economic pressure. The plaintiffs in this case were child miners from the DRC who’ve been injured mining for cobalt, as well their representatives. The lawsuit sought to hold American tech companies accountable for forced labor under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), which makes it unlawful to participate in a venture that uses forced labor. The miners alleged tech companies have participated in a venture by purchasing cobalt from suppliers in the DRC who sell cobalt mined in part by forced labor. The court held that while the child miners did have Article III standing to bring damages claims, they failed to state a claim that the tech companies purchase of cobalt met the standard of “participation in a venture” under the TVPRA.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 15
Unemployment claims rise; a federal court hands victory to government employees union; and employers fire workers over social media posts.
September 14
Workers at Boeing reject the company’s third contract proposal; NLRB Acting General Counsel William Cohen plans to sue New York over the state’s trigger bill; Air Canada flight attendants reject a tentative contract.
September 12
Zohran Mamdani calls on FIFA to end dynamic pricing for the World Cup; the San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement opens a probe into Scale AI’s labor practices; and union members organize immigration defense trainings.
September 11
California rideshare deal advances; Boeing reaches tentative agreement with union; FTC scrutinizes healthcare noncompetes.
September 10
A federal judge denies a motion by the Trump Administration to dismiss a lawsuit led by the American Federation of Government Employees against President Trump for his mass layoffs of federal workers; the Supreme Court grants a stay on a federal district court order that originally barred ICE agents from questioning and detaining individuals based on their presence at a particular location, the type of work they do, their race or ethnicity, and their accent while speaking English or Spanish; and a hospital seeks to limit OSHA's ability to cite employers for failing to halt workplace violence without a specific regulation in place.
September 9
Ninth Circuit revives Trader Joe’s lawsuit against employee union; new bill aims to make striking workers eligible for benefits; university lecturer who praised Hitler gets another chance at First Amendment claims.