
Maddie Chang is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s Tech@Work, contract workers who evaluate search results face layoffs, and a wider look into the tech industry’s “shadow workforce.”
Amidst a wider wave of tech layoffs, Search Engine Land reports on job cuts affecting Google’s “ghost workers” – a general term that refers to contract workers who work behind the scenes of tech platforms’ automated interfaces, often labeling and categorizing text and images to train AI systems. In this instance, Google contracted with firm Appen to provide “search quality raters.” Raters evaluate the quality of various Google search results in an effort to improve their relevance, trustworthiness, and expertise. Google’s $83 million contract with Appen will end in March, and it is unclear what or who will replace the search raters. Google search raters made headlines last February when they protested at Google’s Mountain View headquarters, asking for better wages and benefits. As MarketWatch reported at that time, raters were paid less than Google’s $15 minimum wage for its temporary, contractor and vendor (“TCV”) workers, because raters’ hours were capped such that they did not qualify for TCV pay.
In a separate but related development, Tech Equity Collective has released a new report focusing on contract workers in the tech industry, or what it calls tech’s “shadow workforce.” The report begins with a counterintuitive phenomenon: one might assume that AI would automate the lowest paid jobs and increase the need for higher-paid engineering roles, for example. But the report finds that AI is “displacing high-quality jobs at tech companies…and is creating many more lower-quality jobs in fields like content moderation and data training that are often outsourced to third-party agencies.” It notes these contracted roles have fewer labor protections and are often underpaid, as compared to workers who are directly employed by tech companies.
In drafting the report, Tech Equity Collective interviewed contract workers about their experiences and drew out five top issues. These include: job precarity, lack of voice in the workplace, and unequal pay for equal work. The report also finds that there are a disproportionate number of workers from under-represented racial, ethnic, and gender groups who work as contractors. Finally, interviewees said that the dual management structure (oversight by both the tech company and the subcontractor) serves as an impediment to advancement. Tasks and operations are managed by the tech company, while pay, benefits, and protections are managed by the contractor. Based on these themes, the report ends with, among other proposals, a call for legislation that improves conditions for contract and temporary workers, such as recent a New Jersey state law that creates pay parity for contractors.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
October 8
In today’s news and commentary, the Trump administration threatens no back pay for furloughed federal workers; the Second Circuit denies a request from the NFL for an en banc review in the Brian Flores case; and Governor Gavin Newsom signs an agreement to create a pathway for unionization for Uber and Lyft drivers.
October 7
The Supreme Court kicks off its latest term, granting and declining certiorari in several labor-related cases.
October 6
EEOC regains quorum; Second Circuit issues opinion on DEI causing hostile work environment.
October 5
In today’s news and commentary, HELP committee schedules a vote on Trump’s NLRB nominees, the 5th Circuit rejects Amazon’s request for en banc review, and TV production workers win their first union contract. After a nomination hearing on Wednesday, the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee scheduled a committee vote on President Trump’s NLRB nominees […]
October 3
California legislation empowers state labor board; ChatGPT used in hostile workplace case; more lawsuits challenge ICE arrests
October 2
AFGE and AFSCME sue in response to the threat of mass firings; another preliminary injunction preventing Trump from stripping some federal workers of collective bargaining rights; and challenges to state laws banning captive audience meetings.