
John Fry is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, meatpacking giants settle wage-fixing suit; momentum grows for Boeing strike; and UAW staffers fight for a union contract.
A trio of meatpacking companies has agreed to settle a wage-fixing case for $57 million. Cargill, Hormel Foods, and National Beef were accused in a class-action lawsuit of conspiring to suppress workers’ wages using no-poach agreements and other methods. Several other meat companies have already settled in the same case, and the combined total of settlements to date exceeds $200 million. Relatedly, the Department of Justice has accused Agri Stats, a data company, of enabling a vast price-fixing scheme in the meat industry by disseminating industry-wide reports which the government claims meat companies have used to fix prices at an artificially high, anticompetitive level.
A strike may be impending at Boeing, as the company’s Seattle-area workers react negatively to a tentative agreement that their union reached with the company. While the agreement would provide the workers with a 25% pay raise over four years (a similar increase to what the United Auto Workers won from Detroit’s Big Three automakers last year), the agreement also eliminates a performance bonus for workers and does not restore pensions, which the union lost in its controversial 2014 contract with Boeing. The president of the Machinists local which represents the workers pointed to Boeing’s commitment to build its next line of planes in the Seattle area, an important commitment given the company’s controversial pivot in 2020 to assembling some planes in South Carolina, a move that some regarded as a union avoidance tactic. However, the rank-and-file appears largely unswayed, with some workers chanting “strike” during their lunch break and others preparing supplies for a picket line.
Lastly, UAW staffers who are organizing their own union have accused UAW of retaliating against them and denying them the same protections that UAW seeks for its own members. UAW Staff United has filed various unfair labor practice charges against the union, alleging that one organizer was wrongly terminated and that the union has engaged in bad-faith bargaining. Organizers argue that their own lack of job security undermines their ability to run organizing campaigns and bring more workers into UAW’s membership. For its part, UAW has denied the union’s claims and stated that it bargains in good faith with all unions representing UAW staff.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
April 24
NLRB seeks to compel Amazon to collectively bargain with San Francisco warehouse workers, DoorDash delivery workers and members of Los Deliveristas Unidos rally for pay transparency, and NLRB takes step to drop lawsuit against SpaceX over the firing of employees who criticized Elon Musk.
April 22
DOGE staffers eye NLRB for potential reorganization; attacks on federal workforce impact Trump-supporting areas; Utah governor acknowledges backlash to public-sector union ban
April 21
Bryan Johnson’s ULP saga before the NLRB continues; top law firms opt to appease the EEOC in its anti-DEI demands.
April 20
In today’s news and commentary, the Supreme Court rules for Cornell employees in an ERISA suit, the Sixth Circuit addresses whether the EFAA applies to a sexual harassment claim, and DOGE gains access to sensitive labor data on immigrants. On Thursday, the Supreme Court made it easier for employees to bring ERISA suits when their […]
April 18
Two major New York City unions endorse Cuomo for mayor; Committee on Education and the Workforce requests an investigation into a major healthcare union’s spending; Unions launch a national pro bono legal network for federal workers.
April 17
Utahns sign a petition supporting referendum to repeal law prohibiting public sector collective bargaining; the US District Court for the District of Columbia declines to dismiss claims filed by the AFL-CIO against several government agencies; and the DOGE faces reports that staffers of the agency accessed the NLRB’s sensitive case files.