Sarah Leadem is a joint degree candidate at Harvard Law School and the Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
In today’s News and Commentary, Illinois voters will soon vote on a state constitutional amendment to guarantee collective bargaining, Yale graduate students file for a union election, and Striketober continues for Starbucks while negotiations stall and the company files unfair labor practice charges.
On November 8, Illinois voters will vote to amend their state constitution to guarantee the right to bargain collectively. Illinois’s Amendment 1, dubbed the “Workers’ Rights Amendment,” is a legislatively referred constitutional amendment. That is, it was passed by the Illinois General Assembly last year and now comes before voters in the general election. The ballot measure would amend the state constitution to guarantee all employees the “fundamental right to organize and to bargain collectively” and expressly prohibits any law that interferes with that right. Most significantly, this law would prohibit–or ban–future right to work laws in Illinois. While a few states have similar laws, this is the first time the issue will be left to voters. Amendment 1 has provoked contentious debate. Labor unions support the measure while the Chamber of Commerce and the Illinois Manufacturer’s Association oppose.
Yesterday, graduate student researchers and instructors filed a petition with the NLRB seeking a union election. A large majority of graduate students echoed the call to unionize: According to Unite-Here Local 33, the currently unrecognized graduate student union, more than 3,000 out of 4,000 graduate workers at Yale signed the petition. Students have called on Yale University to remain neutral in the election process. The University has not yet agreed to do so.
Striketober continues for Starbucks workers while negotiations stall and the company files charges. As reported by OnLabor, Starbucks representatives walked out of the first day of bargaining yesterday. The company cited objections to workers joining bargaining virtually and alleged that the union unlawfully recorded negotiations. Starbucks filed unfair labor practice charges against the union. Starbucks Workers United was quick to respond, highlighting that past ULP charges filed by Starbucks have been readily dismissed by the NLRB. Starbucks workers themselves have registered hundreds of violations against the company. At the same time, momentum continues: yesterday, Starbucks workers at the New York City Roastery went on strike and new Starbucks locations voted to join the union.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 27
NY Port Authority proceeds to trial on PUMP Act case; First Circuit denies stay in order vacating H-1B visa fee; DC Circuit panel denies First Amendment claim over disclosure of confidential emails in allegation of prison's COVID-19 mismanagement.
July 24
EEOC drops request for UPenn's Jewish staff; Starbucks defeats mail-in ballots; and Mamdani appoints Lina Khan.
July 23
Ninth Circuit affirms ban of transphobic books in school; leading demographer warns of impending labor shortage.
July 22
EDNY strikes down state labor board law; D.C. Circuit applies Loper Bright to NLRB; Joint employer bill reaches the House floor.
July 21
Fifth Circuit transfers an Anheuser-Busch NLRB case to the Eleventh Circuit; a new report makes the case for tripling union membership.
July 20
New York City weighs banning horse carriages despite union opposition; public defenders go on strike; cinema workers stage walkout.