In today’s news and commentary, service workers at Charlotte Douglas International Airport go on strike, the NLRB rules that Google is a joint employer of a group of unionized contract workers, and farm industry groups petition President-elect Trump to spare their workers from deportation.
Last Friday, service workers at Charlotte Douglas International Airport voted to go on a 24-hour strike. The strike, which includes airline escorts, cabin cleaners, and other essential airport workers, commenced this morning. Workers are demanding an end to poverty wages and protections and respect on the job during the holiday travel season. The workers, represented by Service Employees International Union (SEIU), earn as little as $12.50 per hour – which is not considered a livable wage for a single person without children in Charlotte. Airport officials predict that this week will be the busiest on record, with nearly 1.02 million passengers departing Charlotte between last Thursday and the Monday after Thanksgiving. ABM and Prospect Airport Services announced they would take steps to minimize disruptions.
In a 2-1 ruling last Friday, the NLRB held that Google is a joint employer of a group of contract staffers. The staffers, directly employed by Accenture, voted 26-2 to join the Alphabet Workers Union last November. Last week’s ruling bolsters the position that Google is obligated to negotiate with the Union. The company is already fighting to overturn another NLRB ruling obligating the to negotiate with a union representing YouTube contract staff. These rulings rely on a finding that Google has enough control over the workers and their duties to require the company to share responsibilities under federal labor law.
Farm industry groups are preparing for the mass deportations President-elect Trump promised on the campaign trail. The groups are lobbying the incoming administration to commit to exempting their workers. According to the departments of Labor and Agriculture, approximately 1 million farmworkers, including dairy and meatpacking workers, lack legal status. This is about half of all farmworkers in the United States. The first Trump administration promised not to target food system workers, but went on to conduct raids at poultry and produce packing facilities. In California, where half the produce consumed in the US is grown, farmers overwhelmingly supported Trump’s candidacy. Many say they expect the incoming administration to support their workforce through expansion of legalization programs, streamlining the H-2A temporary guest visas, or simply focusing enforcement elsewhere. A spokesperson for the transition team made no indications that this would be the strategy, instead reiterating the promise to “deport migrant criminals and restore our economic greatness.” Agriculture and related industries contribute about $1.5 trillion – or 5.6%- to US GDP.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
October 8
In today’s news and commentary, the Trump administration threatens no back pay for furloughed federal workers; the Second Circuit denies a request from the NFL for an en banc review in the Brian Flores case; and Governor Gavin Newsom signs an agreement to create a pathway for unionization for Uber and Lyft drivers.
October 7
The Supreme Court kicks off its latest term, granting and declining certiorari in several labor-related cases.
October 6
EEOC regains quorum; Second Circuit issues opinion on DEI causing hostile work environment.
October 5
In today’s news and commentary, HELP committee schedules a vote on Trump’s NLRB nominees, the 5th Circuit rejects Amazon’s request for en banc review, and TV production workers win their first union contract. After a nomination hearing on Wednesday, the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee scheduled a committee vote on President Trump’s NLRB nominees […]
October 3
California legislation empowers state labor board; ChatGPT used in hostile workplace case; more lawsuits challenge ICE arrests
October 2
AFGE and AFSCME sue in response to the threat of mass firings; another preliminary injunction preventing Trump from stripping some federal workers of collective bargaining rights; and challenges to state laws banning captive audience meetings.