Anjali Katta is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s News and Commentary, Trump appeals a court-ordered pause on mass layoffs, the Tenth Circuit sidesteps a ruling on the Board’s remedial powers, and an industry group targets Biden-era NLRB decisions.
The Trump administration is asking the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to pause a temporary order blocking the administration from continuing its mass layoff plan for federal workers. As Justin reported, the court issued a two-week pause on the administration’s ability to make changes across twenty agencies. In response, the administration immediately appealed and filed for an emergency stay of the order. It argued that the “sweeping” order obstructs the Executive Branch from implementing the President’s policy priorities. The Trump administration has asked the Ninth Circuit to rule on the motion by May 15.
The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit partially upheld an NLRB decision against two film studios affirming the agency’s authority to order compensation for “all direct and foreseeable pecuniary harms” for striking drivers who were illegally replaced. The Board had used its 2022 Thryv Inc. standard that allows the agency to demand compensation for harms stemming from an employer’s illegal actions. While one appeals court has struck down Thryv Inc. and another upheld it, its future remains uncertain. On Monday, however, the studios failed to properly challenge Thryv Inc. before the Board, so the court declined to consider it. Judge Allison Eid dissented, arguing the relief exceeded the NLRB’s authority.
An industry coalition, the Coalition for a Democratic Workplace (CDW), is urging the NLRB to reverse Biden-era labor precedents by leveraging President Trump’s executive order asserting that the president and the AG have the power to interpret the law for all agencies. CDW asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to direct the NLRB to ignore 15 significant rulings (including 14 that set new precedents), aiming to curb the board’s longstanding independence and to cause a sudden ‘flip-flop’ in Board policy on a mass scale. These board decisions included those that created a new framework for imposing bargaining orders in response to employers’ labor law violations, required companies to reimburse workers for the financial consequences of unfair labor practices, barred management from holding mandatory captive audience meetings, and banned severance agreements that include waivers of NLRA rights. CDW, and the Trump administration are likely to face legal challenges along the way.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 15
The Department of Labor announces new guidance around Occupational Safety and Health Administration penalty and debt collection procedures; a Cornell University graduate student challenges graduate student employee-status under the National Labor Relations Act; the Supreme Court clears the way for the Trump administration to move forward with a significant staff reduction at the Department of Education.
July 14
More circuits weigh in on two-step certification; Uber challengers Seattle deactivation ordinance.
July 13
APWU and USPS ratify a new contract, ICE barred from racial profiling in Los Angeles, and the fight continues over the dismantling of NIOSH
July 11
Regional director orders election without Board quorum; 9th Circuit pauses injunction on Executive Order; Driverless car legislation in Massachusetts
July 10
Wisconsin Supreme Court holds UW Health nurses are not covered by Wisconsin’s Labor Peace Act; a district judge denies the request to stay an injunction pending appeal; the NFLPA appeals an arbitration decision.
July 9
the Supreme Court allows Trump to proceed with mass firings; Secretary of Agriculture suggests Medicaid recipients replace deported migrant farmworkers; DHS ends TPS for Nicaragua and Honduras