Anjali Katta is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s News and Commentary, Trump appeals a court-ordered pause on mass layoffs, the Tenth Circuit sidesteps a ruling on the Board’s remedial powers, and an industry group targets Biden-era NLRB decisions.
The Trump administration is asking the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to pause a temporary order blocking the administration from continuing its mass layoff plan for federal workers. As Justin reported, the court issued a two-week pause on the administration’s ability to make changes across twenty agencies. In response, the administration immediately appealed and filed for an emergency stay of the order. It argued that the “sweeping” order obstructs the Executive Branch from implementing the President’s policy priorities. The Trump administration has asked the Ninth Circuit to rule on the motion by May 15.
The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit partially upheld an NLRB decision against two film studios affirming the agency’s authority to order compensation for “all direct and foreseeable pecuniary harms” for striking drivers who were illegally replaced. The Board had used its 2022 Thryv Inc. standard that allows the agency to demand compensation for harms stemming from an employer’s illegal actions. While one appeals court has struck down Thryv Inc. and another upheld it, its future remains uncertain. On Monday, however, the studios failed to properly challenge Thryv Inc. before the Board, so the court declined to consider it. Judge Allison Eid dissented, arguing the relief exceeded the NLRB’s authority.
An industry coalition, the Coalition for a Democratic Workplace (CDW), is urging the NLRB to reverse Biden-era labor precedents by leveraging President Trump’s executive order asserting that the president and the AG have the power to interpret the law for all agencies. CDW asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to direct the NLRB to ignore 15 significant rulings (including 14 that set new precedents), aiming to curb the board’s longstanding independence and to cause a sudden ‘flip-flop’ in Board policy on a mass scale. These board decisions included those that created a new framework for imposing bargaining orders in response to employers’ labor law violations, required companies to reimburse workers for the financial consequences of unfair labor practices, barred management from holding mandatory captive audience meetings, and banned severance agreements that include waivers of NLRA rights. CDW, and the Trump administration are likely to face legal challenges along the way.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
February 23
In today’s news and commentary, the Trump administration proposes a rule limiting employment authorization for asylum seekers and Matt Bruenig introduces a new LLM tool analyzing employer rules under Stericycle. Law360 reports that the Trump administration proposed a rule on Friday that would change the employment authorization process for asylum seekers. Under the proposed rule, […]
February 22
A petition for certiorari in Bivens v. Zep, New York nurses end their historic six-week-strike, and Professor Block argues for just cause protections in New York City.
February 20
An analysis of the Board's decisions since regaining a quorum; 5th Circuit dissent criticizes Wright Line, Thryv.
February 19
Union membership increases slightly; Washington farmworker bill fails to make it out of committee; and unions in Argentina are on strike protesting President Milei’s labor reform bill.
February 18
A ruling against forced labor in CO prisons; business coalition lacks standing to challenge captive audience ban; labor unions to participate in rent strike in MN
February 17
San Francisco teachers’ strike ends; EEOC releases new guidance on telework; NFL must litigate discrimination and retaliation claims.