Greg Volynsky is a student at Harvard Law School.
In Today’s News & Commentary, the New York State Assembly passes a bill to enhance penalties for wage theft, Georgetown University to pay up to $550,000 to settle wage theft allegations, Los Angeles voters to determine whether to cap hospital executive pay, ProPublica staff unionize, and more than 3,000 Starbucks baristas plan to strike.
A bill that would criminalize wage theft as felony larceny is set to reach Governor Kathy Hochul’s desk. The legislation, which received the approval of the state Assembly this week, aims to enhance penalties for employers who cheat workers out of their wages. The bill also seeks to help prosecutors identify habitual offenders. Business groups in New York have expressed concerns about the proposed changes, pointing to existing federal laws and the potential additional burden on employers. Labor groups and state Attorney General Letitia James back the measure. The bill comes four months after the Manhattan District Attorney announced a new unit to prosecute wage theft.
In related news, on Tuesday, Georgetown University agreed to pay up to $550,000 to settle allegations that certain hourly employees worked unpaid overtime. The settlement, announced by the D.C. attorney general’s office, stems from an investigation into Georgetown’s overtime practices following a tip from a whistleblower last year.
Los Angeles voters will have the chance to determine, by ballot measure, if hospital executive compensation should be capped at $450,000 per annum. The proposed cap would apply to top officials including CEOs, CFOs, and executive VPs at privately-owned hospitals and affiliated facilities in Los Angeles. The SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West union supports the measure, arguing that executive compensation in the healthcare sector is excessive. The Hospital Association of Southern California opposes the proposal, claiming that it would undermine the ability to recruit and retain top talent.
On Wednesday, staff of the nonprofit investigative newsroom ProPublica announced they are unionizing. The ProPublica Guild will represent reporters, editors, designers, and business and communications staff at the organization. According to the guild, 90% of eligible staff have signed union cards, making ProPublica the latest national publication to gain union representation.
More than 3,000 Starbucks baristas are planning a strike, the Starbucks Workers United Union announced on Friday, in response to alleged instructions to remove LGBTQ-themed decorations from the stores. Starbucks has denied the allegations, claiming it staunchly supports the LGBTQ+ community.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 16
In today’s news and commentary, the NLRB sues New York, a flight attendant sues United, and the Third Circuit considers the employment status of Uber drivers The NLRB sued New York to block a new law that would grant the state authority over private-sector labor disputes. As reported on recently by Finlay, the law, which […]
September 15
Unemployment claims rise; a federal court hands victory to government employees union; and employers fire workers over social media posts.
September 14
Workers at Boeing reject the company’s third contract proposal; NLRB Acting General Counsel William Cohen plans to sue New York over the state’s trigger bill; Air Canada flight attendants reject a tentative contract.
September 12
Zohran Mamdani calls on FIFA to end dynamic pricing for the World Cup; the San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement opens a probe into Scale AI’s labor practices; and union members organize immigration defense trainings.
September 11
California rideshare deal advances; Boeing reaches tentative agreement with union; FTC scrutinizes healthcare noncompetes.
September 10
A federal judge denies a motion by the Trump Administration to dismiss a lawsuit led by the American Federation of Government Employees against President Trump for his mass layoffs of federal workers; the Supreme Court grants a stay on a federal district court order that originally barred ICE agents from questioning and detaining individuals based on their presence at a particular location, the type of work they do, their race or ethnicity, and their accent while speaking English or Spanish; and a hospital seeks to limit OSHA's ability to cite employers for failing to halt workplace violence without a specific regulation in place.