Liana Wang is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, Trump issues an EO on college sports, a second district court judge blocks the Department of Labor from winding down Job Corps, and Safeway workers in California reach a tentative agreement.
On Thursday, President Trump announced an executive order titled “Saving College Sports,” which declared it common sense that “college sports are not, and should not be, professional sports.” As athletes have sought to redefine their relationship with their universities over the past few years, the NCAA and athletic conferences have lobbied Congress for a bill, the SCORE Act, that would provide them with antitrust protections and prevent student-athletes from being deemed employees. Although the bill currently lacks the bipartisan support it would need to pass both the House and Senate, President Trump’s EO pressures Congress to act. Moreover, it explicitly directs the NLRB to “clarify” the status of student athletes through “guidance, rules or other appropriate actions.” This directive will likely make it more difficult for student athletes to organize in any capacity.
On Friday, U.S. District Judge Dabney L. Friedrich granted the second preliminary injunction to block the Trump Administration from shutting down the Job Corps program, which provides not just workforce training, but also housing and medical care. The plaintiffs in Cabrera v. Department of Labor are a group of Job Corps students who challenged DOL’s actions under the APA. On the basis of those APA claims, Judge Friedrich granted a broader injunction on the basis of vacatur compared to a previous preliminary injunction granted in New York. In that case, brought by a group of Job Corps contractors who did not make APA claims, the district judge narrowed the injunction to cover only 31 of the 99 Job Corps centers after Trump v. CASA.
Lastly, in California, members of United Food and Commercial Workers reached a tentative agreement with Safeway after five months of negotiations and multiple threats to strike. Earlier this month, 95% of union members voted to approve a strike if a deal was not reached this weekend. If the strikes had taken place, they would have been one of the largest grocery strikes in Northern California in 30 years. The potential new contract includes higher wages, improved pension plans and work scheduling, and better health care benefits. Union members are slated to vote for ratification in the coming days. The new agreement follows previous UFCW negotiations in Southern California and Colorado, covered by Finlay earlier this month.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
August 30
Seattle teachers vote to authorize a strike days before the school year begins; BNSF Railway’s AI dispatching system puts workers in danger; and a California court finds that the DOL’s pay cuts for non-citizen farmworkers are unlawful.
August 28
Calls for a “token tax” on AI consumption grow and the number of Amazon workers on federal aid explodes.
August 27
NLRB GC targets Biden-era precedent; Starbucks Workers United calls for boycott; Encore Boston Harbor workers authorize strike
August 26
Trump administration proposes $103,000 H-1B visa fee after court blocks earlier attempt; Illinois governor signs law enabling state investment in AFL-CIO housing trust; Deloitte pays $21.5 million to settle DOJ probe alleging DEI-related discrimination in federal contracts.
August 25
Hyundai workers reach a tentative agreement; Federal-sector unions sue the Trump Administration over OPM rule changes; Federal judge dismisses a teachers’ union free speech suit.
August 24
Boeing engineers and technicians reject contract proposals and authorize a strike; Ninth Circuit holds that unions charged under 8(b)(4)(D) cannot invoke the work-preservation defense to disregard 10(k) determination.