Holt McKeithan is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s News and Commentary, the California Supreme Court upholds Uber and Lyft-backed Prop 22, video game workers take action, and a federal judge sides with SpaceX over the NLRB.
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court upheld Proposition 22, a ballot measure that classifies drivers of ride-hailing apps as independent contractors rather than employees. The court rejected a constitutional challenge to the law. Opponents argued it would limit the state legislature’s ability to oversee workers’ compensation. The initiative was first passed in 2020 behind an enormous lobbying campaign in which gig companies spent $200 million to support the measure. Yesterday’s ruling means that the hundreds of thousands of drivers who work for Uber and Lyft in California will continue to be classified as independent contractors. While Uber and Lyft cheered the decision, the plaintiff, Hector Castellanos, condemned it. According to the New York Times, he said the ruling comes “at the expense of the Black, brown, and immigrant workers.”
Yesterday, the SAG-AFTRA actors’ union called a strike against video game companies that use actors’ images or voices in games. SAG-AFTRA is seeking higher wages and job protections from artificial intelligence. “We’re not going to consent to a contract that allows companies to abuse A.I. to the detriment of our members,” said Fran Drescher, the union’s president. Members of the union, who number 160,000, will no longer voice act in video games produced by Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and eight other companies.
Additionally, more than 500 Activision Blizzard workers behind the World of Warcraft franchise have voted to unionize. The employees are joining the Communication Workers of America. The union is the largest of this kind at a Microsoft-owned studio. The workers’ organizing efforts were aided by the labor neutrality provision Microsoft agreed to when it bought Activision Blizzard last year.
Earlier this month, a Western District of Texas judge preliminarily enjoined the NLRB’s unfair labor practice proceedings against SpaceX. On Tuesday, the Trump appointee published his rationale. John explains the ruling here. In short, Judge Albright held that removal protections for NLRB administrative law judges are unconstitutional.
Check out other recent OnLabor posts, including Holden, Jacqueline, and John’s analysis of JD Vance’s labor record. (It’s not good). Ben and Riva also break down how California can work around Cedar Point to ensure union access.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
February 13
Sex workers in Nevada fight to become the nation’s first to unionize; industry groups push NLRB to establish a more business-friendly test for independent contractor status; and UFCW launches an anti-AI price setting in grocery store campaign.
February 12
Teamsters sue UPS over buyout program; flight attendants and pilots call for leadership change at American Airlines; and Argentina considers major labor reforms despite forceful opposition.
February 11
Hollywood begins negotiations for a new labor agreement with writers and actors; the EEOC launches an investigation into Nike’s DEI programs and potential discrimination against white workers; and Mayor Mamdani circulates a memo regarding the city’s Economic Development Corporation.
February 10
San Francisco teachers walk out; NLRB reverses course on SpaceX; NYC nurses secure tentative agreements.
February 9
FTC argues DEI is anticompetitive collusion, Supreme Court may decide scope of exception to forced arbitration, NJ pauses ABC test rule.
February 8
The Second Circuit rejects a constitutional challenge to the NLRB, pharmacy and lab technicians join a California healthcare strike, and the EEOC defends a single better-paid worker standard in Equal Pay Act suits.