
Holt McKeithan is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s News & Commentary, how unions can defend immigrant workers in the face of ICE raids, Utah Republicans advance a restrictive labor law, and how to use state and local funds to build worker power.
The Trump administration has begun aggressively raiding worksites to find and deport undocumented immigrants. Based on a survey of collective bargaining agreements compiled by unions and labor activists, Labor Notes released suggestions for defending immigrant workers in union contracts. Suggested provisions include requiring employers to ensure ICE complies with legal requirements before entering the worksite, informing employees if ICE has issued a subpoena for a search to the employer, allowing 90-day absences from work for employees to gain extensions or continuations of lawful residence status, protecting private employee information like immigration status, and more.
Republicans in Utah advanced a bill that would ban collective bargaining for all public sector workers in the state. Teachers see the bill as a direct political attack. ““The harm of the bill will be borne by public school educators living and working in every single legislative district,” said Sara Jones of the Utah Education Association. “It sends a message that educators don’t deserve a collective voice in their profession, don’t deserve input on their salaries or working conditions or benefits, or don’t deserve a say in the policies that impact their classrooms.”
The bill advanced out of the state house committee. It would place Utah alongside North and South Carolina, the two most restrictive states for public sector unions.
Demos has released a report on using state and local funding to build worker power. It highlights ways governments can work within the so-called “market participant” exception to broad federal preemption of state labor regulation, in which a government may impose labor conditions on recipients of public funding, rather than acting as a direct regulator. It suggests a focus on pro-worker provisions in project labor agreements in the construction industry, labor peace agreements in other industries, and community benefits agreements for publicly funded projects.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
February 7
In today’s News and Commentary, the NLRB withdraws its objections to SpaceX’s constitutional challenge, Whole Foods asks the NLRB to set aside a union election in Philadelphia, and the AFL-CIO launches a campaign to push back against Musk. The NLRB filed a letter with the Fifth Circuit indicating it would not address SpaceX’s challenge to […]
February 6
Gwynne Wilcox files lawsuit challenging her removal from the NLRB, and unions file a lawsuit challenging DOJE's request to access Department of Labor information.
February 5
Trump's disagreements with Abruzzo & Wilcox, Dollar General's plan for ICE agents, remote work in federal CBA's.
February 4
In today's news and commentary King Soopers workers announce a strike, Congressman Biggs introduces a bill to abolish OSHA, the UAW announces willingness to support Trump's tariffs, and Yale New Haven Health System faces a wage and hour class action.
February 2
President Trump seeks to nullify recent collective bargaining agreements with federal workers; Trump fired the NLRB’s acting General Counsel; Costco and the Teamsters reach a tentative deal averting a strike; Black History Month began yesterday with the theme African Americans and Labor
January 31
In today’s news and commentary, AFGE and AFSCME sue Trump for an Executive Order stripping protections from government employees, Trump fires members of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Amazon shutters operations in the entirety of Quebec in response to union successes. On Wednesday, two unions representing government employees–American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and […]