Divya Nimmagadda is a student at Harvard Law School.
In the post-transition flood of executive orders and actions, one effort in particular takes special aim at diversity and inclusion measures with the federal workforce.
As part of a larger executive action and order aimed at dismantling DEI programming, President Trump rolled back the Equal Employment Act of 1965. The Act, in the form of an executive order (Executive Order 11246), was originally put in place by President Johnson in the midst of the Civil Rights Movement and the year after the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1974. It instituted affirmative action programming within the federal workplace and “prohibit[ed] federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.” Within the same action, Trump revoked another 2011 executive order that “Establish[ed] a Coordinated Government-wide Initiative to Promote Diversity and Inclusion in the Federal Workforce” and, in a forward-looking measure, is requiring the head of each agency to include in any government contract or grant “[a] term requiring such counterparty or recipient to certify that it does not operate any programs promoting DEI that violate any applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws.” Based on Trump’s directive, the Office of Personnel Management issued a memo ordering all DEI employees to be placed on administrative leave by Wednesday of next week.
We are already beginning to see the effects of the administration’s effort to limit the federal DEI infrastructure. A CIA spokesperson stated that the agency had gotten rid of its office for diversity and inclusion. The Agriculture, Treasury and Labor Departments had each taken down some webpages on diversity measures by yesterday morning.
Relatedly, yesterday, the administration sent out a message to federal employees warning them that they may face “adverse consequences” if they attempted to hide efforts by fellow colleagues or supervisors to defy the above order to end all DEI programs. Employees were given ten days to report such efforts to “disguise these programs by using coded or imprecise language.”
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 24
NLRB abandons rule for offensive conduct during protected activity; New York home care workers seek a union election; maritime deck officers endure long fight for first contracts.
September 23
DoorDash settles delivery-worker pay claims; Philadelphia school workers win new contract; stock gains spur retirements.
September 22
Judge blocks ICE raids in Alabama; Chicago hotel workers vote to strike; AutoZone workers look to create first union
September 21
In today’s News and Commentary, the Seventh Circuit raises the bar for the NLRB to obtain preliminary injunctions, the California Primary Care Association sues SEIU-UHW for racketeering, and the Seventh Circuit finds that an employer group and think tank do not have standing to challenge an Illinois law banning captive audience meetings. On Friday, the […]
September 20
Culinary Workers Union members protests union leadership; lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft reveal internal concerns about the threat of AI training to human labor.
September 17
Unions push to block Google from buying Spirit Airlines employment records; U.S. Department of Labor sues Oklahoma coffee chain over alleged wage violations.