
Sunah Chang is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary: CSU faculty reach a tentative deal, Democrats introduce bill to increase taxes on CEO salaries, and Florida advances bills that would loosen child labor protections.
After one day of striking, California State University faculty have reached a tentative deal, which will immediately raise salaries by 5 percent (applied retroactively from July 1, 2023) and will increase salaries by another 5 percent on July 1, 2024. The deal will also raise the salary of lowest-paid faculty members (currently set at $54,360) by $3,000 and increase paid parental leave from six weeks to 10 weeks. The deal comes after eight months of negotiations between the California Faculty Association and university management and marks a close to the first strike mobilizing faculty from all of CSU’s 23 campuses.
In Washington, Bernie Sanders and a group of Democrats have introduced the Tax Excessive CEO Pay Act, which seeks to raise taxes on companies that pay their highest-paid executives at least 50 times more than what they pay their typical worker. Under the Act, the tax penalty levied against companies would increase as the CEO-to-worker salary ratio increases. Companies that pay their top executives between 50 to 100 times more than their typical workers would receive a tax penalty of 0.5 percent whereas companies that pay their top executives more than 500 times their typical workers would face the maximum tax penalty of 5 percent.
According to a press release by Bernie Sanders, the Act is projected to raise around $150 billion over 10 years and seeks to mitigate the growing wage disparities between corporate executives and workers. The bill has won endorsements from major worker-side advocacy groups and unions, including AFL-CIO, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, and Service Employees International Union. However, the bill will likely face an uphill battle in the narrowly-Democratic Senate and the Republican-controlled House of Representatives.
Turning to Florida, the state legislature is pushing forward two bills that would weaken child labor protections in the state. The first bill, which was passed by a state senate committee last week, seeks to allow 16- and 17-year-olds to work on construction projects in residential neighborhoods. The second bill, which is moving through the state house legislature committee, seeks to allow 16- and 17-year-olds to work up to 40 hours a week (above the current maximum of 30 hours a week) even when school is in session and would eliminate child work break protections for 16- and 17-year-olds.
Experts have attributed these lenient child labor bills to labor shortage issues in Florida, which have been exacerbated by the state’s increased crackdown on undocumented immigrant workers. The proposed bills have prompted massive pushback from policy and advocacy groups. Over 100 organizations have signed onto a letter by the Florida Policy Institute urging the state legislature to reject the two bills. Youth activists have also organized rallies to oppose the bills.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
April 21
Bryan Johnson’s ULP saga before the NLRB continues; top law firms opt to appease the EEOC in its anti-DEI demands.
April 20
In today’s news and commentary, the Supreme Court rules for Cornell employees in an ERISA suit, the Sixth Circuit addresses whether the EFAA applies to a sexual harassment claim, and DOGE gains access to sensitive labor data on immigrants. On Thursday, the Supreme Court made it easier for employees to bring ERISA suits when their […]
April 18
Two major New York City unions endorse Cuomo for mayor; Committee on Education and the Workforce requests an investigation into a major healthcare union’s spending; Unions launch a national pro bono legal network for federal workers.
April 17
Utahns sign a petition supporting referendum to repeal law prohibiting public sector collective bargaining; the US District Court for the District of Columbia declines to dismiss claims filed by the AFL-CIO against several government agencies; and the DOGE faces reports that staffers of the agency accessed the NLRB’s sensitive case files.
April 16
7th Circuit questions the relevance of NLRB precedent after Loper Bright, unions seek to defend silica rule, and Abrego Garcia's union speaks out.
April 15
In today’s news and commentary, SAG-AFTRA reaches a tentative agreement, AFT sues the Trump Administration, and California offers its mediation services to make up for federal cuts. SAG-AFTRA, the union representing approximately 133,000 commercial actors and singers, has reached a tentative agreement with advertisers and advertising agencies. These companies were represented in contract negotiations by […]