Holden Hopkins is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s News & Commentary, new reporting on Trump’s Labor Secretary pick and the NLRB rules that Starbucks’ dress code violates labor law.
Otto reported last week that President-elect Trump would be nominating Representative Lori Chavez-DeRemer (R-OR), one of the few Republican sponsors of the PRO Act. Her nomination was perceived by some to be a potentially pro-labor move from Trump, who has run repeatedly on populist messaging but delivered a solidly pro-business agenda during his first term.
However, reporting from Josh Eidelson suggests that first appearance may be deceiving. After a number of business groups expressed alarm with the pick of Representative Chavez-DeRemer, members of the transition team reportedly assured them that they would “find Chavez-DeRemer more palatable once the president-elect’s picks for deputy labor secretary and other posts are revealed.” Former Bush-era DoL official Paul DeCamp further pushed the idea that Chavez-DeRemer would serve merely as a symbolic gesture to appease Trump-friendly union leaders like Sean O’Brien, questioning the level of autonomy Secretary Chavez-DeRemer would have. “I really don’t know who is going to be calling the shots,” DeCamp told Eidelson.
Last week, the NLRB ruled against Starbucks’ dress code policy at its New York City Roastery Reserve cafe, finding it violates labor law. The Board panel unanimously determined that the policy—which bans most personal, political, or religious pins and limits workers to the display of just one labor-related pin—is unlawfully broad and limits workers’ rights to organize. The dress code also barred workers from wearing shirts with graphics, including union insignia. In 2022, Starbucks Workers United filed the initial complaint, alleging that managers threatened employees with disciplinary action for wearing union-related apparel.
The Board ordered Starbucks to rescind or revise its dress code and cease other labor law violations.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
May 30
Trump's tariffs temporarily reinstated after brief nationwide injunction; Louisiana Bill targets payroll deduction of union dues; Colorado Supreme Court to consider a self-defense exception to at-will employment
May 29
AFGE argues termination of collective bargaining agreement violates the union’s First Amendment rights; agricultural workers challenge card check laws; and the California Court of Appeal reaffirms San Francisco city workers’ right to strike.
May 28
A proposal to make the NLRB purely adjudicatory; a work stoppage among court-appointed lawyers in Massachusetts; portable benefits laws gain ground
May 27
a judge extends a pause on the Trump Administration’s mass-layoffs, the Fifth Circuit refuses to enforce an NLRB order, and the Texas Supreme court extends workplace discrimination suits to co-workers.
May 26
Federal court blocks mass firings at Department of Education; EPA deploys new AI tool; Chiquita fires thousands of workers.
May 25
United Airlines flight attendants reach tentative agreement; Whole Foods workers secure union certification; One Big Beautiful Bill Act cuts $1.1 trillion