
Will Ebeler is a student at Harvard Law School.
In this weekend’s news and commentary, OSHA fines Amazon for workplace hazards, UPS workers begin voting on tentative agreement, Alphabet Workers Union files unfair labor practice charge against Alphabet Inc., and recent reports explore the increasing relevance of automation for Hollywood’s actors and writers unions.
On Thursday the Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration found that Amazon had violated federal workplace safety laws at a fulfillment center in New Jersey. According to OSHA, workers were required to perform tasks that ultimately caused muscular disorders and neck and back injuries. Amazon also failed to make sure employees received proper medical care when they were injured on the job. The agency recommended a $15,625 penalty—the maximum penalty for this violation. The department has 18 open investigations at Amazon locations in the United States and, according to Reuters, has assessed roughly $150,000 in fines against Amazon this year.
On Friday, UPS workers began voting on the tentative agreement that the Teamsters reached in July. Voting will continue through August 22. As John explained, last week Teamsters locals voted to endorse the tentative agreement by a 161–1 vote. Outside analysts expect workers to approve the deal. However, a group of part-time UPS drivers called “Teamsters Organize” has mobilized a “Vote No” campaign pushing for a better deal for part-time workers. The tentative agreement would raise hourly wages for part-time workers from $16.20 to $21, and Teamsters Organize is pushing for part-time hourly wages of at least $25.
Next, on Thursday, Alphabet Workers Union—the union representing Google Help workers—filed an unfair labor practice charge against Alphabet Inc. The workers were employed by a third-party vendor, Accenture Plc, but their work was focused on supporting Google, and workers said they spent most of their time working closely with Google employees. For that reason, the union alleges Google was the workers’ joint employer; the NLRB found in July that Google was the joint employer of a group of workers doing similar work. According to the union, Alphabet illegally retaliated against employees as they were trying to unionize. In June Accenture workers announced a unionizing campaign then in July, Accenture announced that it was cutting its Google Help workforce from roughly 130 to 40. The union has alleged that the layoffs are retaliation for the unionizing effort.
Finally, artificial intelligence has become a high-profile point of disagreement between Hollywood studios and unions. Both WGA and SAG-AFTRA have pushed to ensure that members are protected from studio use of AI. In response, studios have tried to discount the risk that automation will replace actors by pointing to proposals that would, for example, require that actors consent to automated uses of their likenesses. However, reports in last week’s New York Times and Los Angeles Times highlight how automation is already present in the movie and television industry.
On Friday, the New York Times reported on existing technology that could let studios replace actors. The 2016 movie Rogue One included the likeness of Peter Cushing—an actor who died in 1994—by using motion capture and a digital rendition of Cushing’s face. One visual effects company said in a statement that existing technology lets it “create performances of historical figures based on existing footage.” And many studios use automation to fill out extras in crowd scenes. As the NY Times explains, although it may currently be too expensive to completely replace actors, existing technology can reduce studios’ need for actors, and possibly writers. Although studio proposals would require actor “consent,” in practice only high-profile stars would be able to effectively negotiate approved uses of their likeness.
Earlier in the week, the Los Angeles Times explored a recent hiring surge among Hollywood studios looking for automation workers. In its reporting, the LA Times found that Netflix has more than a dozen active LinkedIn job postings targeting workers with AI expertise, and one listing said that AI helps Netflix “create great content.” Other studios have posted such positions as “AI Prompt Animator.” Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, SAG-AFTRA’s national executive director and chief negotiator, said the job listings appear to point to a broader strategy to “set up a post-strike dynamic around AI” rather than a direct attempt to break the ongoing strikes.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 10
A federal judge denies a motion by the Trump Administration to dismiss a lawsuit led by the American Federation of Government Employees against President Trump for his mass layoffs of federal workers; the Supreme Court grants a stay on a federal district court order that originally barred ICE agents from questioning and detaining individuals based on their presence at a particular location, the type of work they do, their race or ethnicity, and their accent while speaking English or Spanish; and a hospital seeks to limit OSHA's ability to cite employers for failing to halt workplace violence without a specific regulation in place.
September 9
Ninth Circuit revives Trader Joe’s lawsuit against employee union; new bill aims to make striking workers eligible for benefits; university lecturer who praised Hitler gets another chance at First Amendment claims.
September 8
DC Circuit to rule on deference to NLRB, more vaccine exemption cases, Senate considers ban on forced arbitration for age discrimination claims.
September 7
Another weak jobs report, the Trump Administration's refusal to arbitrate with federal workers, and a district court judge's order on the constitutionality of the Laken-Riley Act.
September 5
Pro-labor legislation in New Jersey; class action lawsuit by TN workers proceeds; a report about wage theft in D.C.
September 4
Eighth Circuit avoids a challenge to Minnesota’s ban on captive audience meetings; ALJ finds that Starbucks violated the NLRA again; and a district court certifies a class of behavioral health workers pursuing wage claims.