Will Ebeler is a student at Harvard Law School.
In this weekend’s news and commentary, UAW plans to strike at a Kentucky Ford factory; Amazon claims that the NLRB is unconstitutional; and Starbucks shareholders push for disclosure of company’s spending on union-busting.
A local of the United Auto Workers is planning to strike at a Ford factory in Kentucky. Although the national UAW negotiated a master agreement last fall, individual local unions can bargain around local issues. The union represents roughly 9,000 workers at the factory and has been negotiating with Ford over health and safety issues at the plant. It plans to strike starting on Friday if the parties can’t reach a deal.
On Thursday, Amazon joined SpaceX and Trader Joe’s in arguing that the National Labor Relations Board is unconstitutional. It made its argument in a brief to an administrative law judge in a case about the company’s alleged retaliation against workers at its unionized Staten Island warehouse. Its arguments track those already made by SpaceX and Trader Joe’s: that the Board’s structure infringes on the Article II executive power, that the Board’s proceedings violate both Articles I and III, and that the Board’s proceedings violate the company’s right to a trial by jury. As Ben noted on Friday, John will be covering these arguments in greater detail.
Finally, on Friday a shareholder at Starbucks wrote an open letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission alleging that Starbucks has failed to disclose $240 million it spent union-busting. The shareholder is the Strategic Organizing Center, a coalition of North American unions. According to SOC, the information is necessary for “informed voting decisions” before the company’s annual shareholder meeting on March 13. SOC has nominated three candidates to Starbucks’s board of directors, including Wilma Liebman, a former member of the NLRB. According to SOC, the expenses include litigation, lost employee time, and liabilities associated with alleged labor law violations.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
August 10
Employee sues for a fossil-fuel-free 401(k) plan as a religious accommodation; DHS submits a proposed rule eliminating 60-day grace period for H-1B workers; Eighth Circuit dismisses constitutional challenge to the FMSHRC.
August 7
Starbucks beats claims it denied shifts to union workers; Center for State Labor Innovation aims to address labor law shortcomings.
August 6
Taylor Farms faces scrutiny over labor practices; Bipartisan labor bill gains momentum.
August 5
Clash over potential change to Canada’s labor code; Harvard’s Center for Labor and a Just Economy releases model sectoral bargaining laws; NJ sues Amazon for antitrust violations.
August 4
WestJet reaches a deal to end a flight attendant strike; the NLRB rules Whole Foods legally banned Black Lives Matter display; a commentary argues college athletes should have the right to collectively bargain.
August 3
Queens College faculty stage protest; UAW holds presidential debate; the Protect College Sports Act gets new life.