Henry Green is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s News and Commentary, a look at on-campus labor stories here in Massachusetts, where university administrators appear to be pushing back in negotiations with academic unions.
At Clark University, the Boston Globe reports that undergraduate student workers (which include students who earn hourly wages through work-study programs) ended a ten day strike without winning an agreement for card check recognition. Teamsters Local 170, which has represented graduate students at Clark since 2022, filed a petition with the NLRB to represent the undergraduates in February, but later withdrew the petition and was seeking a card check agreement. A blog post from Proskauer chronicles a wave of undergraduate organizing since 2016, with unions representing resident advisors, tour guides, and students who work in dining halls, libraries, and cafes, among other roles.
Notably, the Globe reports that “attorneys for Clark also argued in a legal filing to the National Labor Relations Board that a federal ban on undergraduate unions in place until 2016 had been wrongly overturned,” referring to the NLRB’s decision in Columbia University. Columbia approved a bargaining unit that included both graduate and undergraduate teaching assistants. A Clark spokesperson later said the university would not challenge Columbia University, though the issue may have been mooted by the Teamsters withdrawing their NLRB petition.
Meanwhile, at Wellesley College, non-tenure-track faculty went on strike last week. The Globe reports that in response, the university emailed students with a choice to either switch into classes still being held, or risk not getting academic credit for the classes with striking professors. Wellesley’s provost cited federal regulations requiring credits to be consistent with a minimum number of classroom hours for the decision. However, the Globe notes some observers saw the move as “unusually aggressive.” The professors organized last year and have been in the process of bargaining a first contract over the past 10 months. Per the Globe, a provision over the number of classes to be taught by non-tenure-track faculty proved to be the major sticking point in negotiations and motivated the strike. The union was expected to return to the bargaining table yesterday.
Here at Harvard, negotiations got underway in February for a third contract with the Harvard Graduate Student Union (HGSU). The Crimson reported last week that HGSU and the University were unable to agree on ground rules for the negotiation, with the union pushing for open bargaining (which would allow union members who aren’t on the bargaining committee to attend) and the university preferring closed sessions. The union said in an email to its members that Harvard representatives have argued open bargaining in 2021 created a “chilling effect.” On Friday, with the sides unable to agree, HGSU agreed to negotiate “without ground rules” about bargaining observation. The union and Harvard bargain biweekly. The current HGSU contract expires on June 30.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
May 13
House Republicans push for vote on the SCORE Act; Wells Fargo wins 401(k) forfeiture appeal; Georgia passes portable benefits bill.
May 12
Trump administration proposes expanding fertility care benefits; Connecticut passes employment legislation; NFL referees ratify new collective bargaining agreement.
May 11
NLRB Judge finds UPS violated federal labor law; Tennessee bans certain noncompetes; and Colorado passes a bill restricting AI price- and wage-setting
May 10
Workers at the Long Island Rail Road threaten to strike, and referees at the National Football League reach a collective bargaining agreement.
May 9
HGSU wraps up its third week on strike and economists find that firms tend to target workers with “wage premiums” for AI replacement.
May 7
DOL drops litigation of Biden-era overtime rule; EEOC sues NYT for discrimination against white male employee; New Jersey finalizes employee classification rule.