Everest Fang is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary: the Tenth Circuit upholds the Biden Administration’s minimum wage for seasonal recreational contract workers, fired Google employees file an NLRB complaint, and the vote to unionize a Chicago Trader Joe’s is indeterminate.
Yesterday, the Tenth Circuit upheld a U.S. Department of Labor rule requiring government contractors to pay seasonal recreational workers at least $15 an hour. The rule implemented President Joe Biden’s 2021 Executive Order raising the minimum wage for workers on federal contracts to $15 an hour, and eliminating a Trump-era exemption for seasonal recreational employers. Rafting companies challenged the elimination of the exemption in 2021, arguing that forcing recreational firms to pay workers $15 per hour would limit the services they provide and raise their costs. The Tenth Circuit reasoned that the Department had addressed those concerns in the rule, which asserts that higher wages reduce worker absenteeism and turnover, and increase the quality of services provided to the government and the public. In dissent, Judge Allison Eid argued that the Procurement Act is unconstitutional for failing to impose limits on the President’s procurement power.
On Monday, dozens of Google employees who were fired for protesting the company’s cloud computing contract with the Israeli government filed a complaint with the NLRB. The single-page complaint alleges that by firing the workers, Google interfered with their rights to advocate for better working conditions. The company has fired about 50 employees for protesting at various office locations, some of whom were arrested. In their complaint, the workers seek to be reinstated to their jobs with back pay and a statement from Google that it will not violate workers’ rights to organize. The NLRB did not immediately set a timetable for reviewing the case.
In other news, the outcome of a closely-watched vote to unionize a Trader Joe’s on Chicago’s North Side is unclear after ballots were tallied late Monday. Workers voted 70 to 70, with one contested vote, which will determine whether the union succeeds. The NLRB will decide whether the vote is yes, no, or invalid; and only a yes vote will secure victory for the union. While Trader Joe’s management did not publicly oppose the Chicago effort, the grocery store chain is facing a litany of charges alleging anti-union tactics at other locations that have voted to organize. The NLRB has filed five complaints with 24 charges against Trader Joe’s since 2023.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
April 24
NLRB seeks to compel Amazon to collectively bargain with San Francisco warehouse workers, DoorDash delivery workers and members of Los Deliveristas Unidos rally for pay transparency, and NLRB takes step to drop lawsuit against SpaceX over the firing of employees who criticized Elon Musk.
April 22
DOGE staffers eye NLRB for potential reorganization; attacks on federal workforce impact Trump-supporting areas; Utah governor acknowledges backlash to public-sector union ban
April 21
Bryan Johnson’s ULP saga before the NLRB continues; top law firms opt to appease the EEOC in its anti-DEI demands.
April 20
In today’s news and commentary, the Supreme Court rules for Cornell employees in an ERISA suit, the Sixth Circuit addresses whether the EFAA applies to a sexual harassment claim, and DOGE gains access to sensitive labor data on immigrants. On Thursday, the Supreme Court made it easier for employees to bring ERISA suits when their […]
April 18
Two major New York City unions endorse Cuomo for mayor; Committee on Education and the Workforce requests an investigation into a major healthcare union’s spending; Unions launch a national pro bono legal network for federal workers.
April 17
Utahns sign a petition supporting referendum to repeal law prohibiting public sector collective bargaining; the US District Court for the District of Columbia declines to dismiss claims filed by the AFL-CIO against several government agencies; and the DOGE faces reports that staffers of the agency accessed the NLRB’s sensitive case files.