
Maddie Chang is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, Trader Joe’s workers in Oakland file a petition to form a union; a Kenyan court temporarily blocks Meta contractor’s mass layoff of content moderators; and Starbucks workers at more than 100 stores walkout ahead of shareholders’ meeting.
On Tuesday, about 150 workers at a Trader Joe’s store in Oakland filed a petition with the NLRB to hold a union election. As the Los Angeles Times reports, the Oakland workers would join a nationwide push to unionize among Trader Joe’s workers that started last May. The Oakland store would be the first location in California unionize. Organizers are responding to a number of pay and working condition issues, including an inconsistent pay-scale that creates big pay discrepancies among workers, skipped raises during the pandemic, and the company’s refusal to put in conveyor belts at registers, which would reduce physical strain on workers packing groceries.
The Oakland effort coincides with a union push by workers at the Essex Crossing location of Trader Joe’s in Manhattan. There, workers are organizing for benefits, better safety conditions, and better pay. As the Gothamist reports, the safety issues were typified in a recent incident where sewage leaked from the ceiling.
A Kenyan court has issued an interim injunction against Meta and its Nairobi-based outsourcing firm Sama to prevent Sama from laying off 260 content moderators. Earlier this week, 43 content moderators brought a claim against Sama for unlawful termination, saying they were being laid off for organizing a union. The workers also sued Sama competitor Majorel for blacklisting them from applying for equivalent jobs after Meta switched its sourcing from Sama to Majorel. As reported in TechCrunch, this challenge comes on the back of a suit brought by former Sama content moderator Daniel Motaung, who alleged that the Sama engaged in “forced labor and human trafficking, unfair labor relations, union busting and failure to provide ‘adequate’ mental health and psychosocial support.”
Finally, workers at more than 100 Starbucks stores went on strike Wednesday ahead of a shareholders’ meeting today (see strike map here). As new Starbucks CEO Laxman Narasimhan takes the reins, workers are asking shareholders to vote for a resolution that would prompt a third-party assessment of the workers’ rights against Starbucks’ own stated commitments to workers.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 12
Zohran Mamdani calls on FIFA to end dynamic pricing for the World Cup; the San Francisco Office of Labor Standards Enforcement opens a probe into Scale AI’s labor practices; and union members organize immigration defense trainings.
September 11
California rideshare deal advances; Boeing reaches tentative agreement with union; FTC scrutinizes healthcare noncompetes.
September 10
A federal judge denies a motion by the Trump Administration to dismiss a lawsuit led by the American Federation of Government Employees against President Trump for his mass layoffs of federal workers; the Supreme Court grants a stay on a federal district court order that originally barred ICE agents from questioning and detaining individuals based on their presence at a particular location, the type of work they do, their race or ethnicity, and their accent while speaking English or Spanish; and a hospital seeks to limit OSHA's ability to cite employers for failing to halt workplace violence without a specific regulation in place.
September 9
Ninth Circuit revives Trader Joe’s lawsuit against employee union; new bill aims to make striking workers eligible for benefits; university lecturer who praised Hitler gets another chance at First Amendment claims.
September 8
DC Circuit to rule on deference to NLRB, more vaccine exemption cases, Senate considers ban on forced arbitration for age discrimination claims.
September 7
Another weak jobs report, the Trump Administration's refusal to arbitrate with federal workers, and a district court judge's order on the constitutionality of the Laken-Riley Act.