At the New York Times, Michael Corkery writes about the allies “Dreamers” find in the business world. The article, which identifies public statements made in support of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program by prominent business figures (e.g. Mark Zuckerberg), is published on the heels of reports that the Trump administration intends to end DACA with a six-month delay.
Further to yesterday’s commentary on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) negotiations, Reuters reports that the “Trump administration’s expected demands for U.S.-specific automotive content requirements was emerging as a major obstacle to a deal.” Such requirements would establish that a certain portion of a car’s components be U.S.-made in order to receive duty-free treatment. As the article reports, this would create complications for both Detroit and international auto-manufacturers. The Trump administration has identified reducing the U.S. trade deficit as a “top priority” in renegotiating the Agreement, and the auto sector comprises most of the trade deficit with Mexico.
Last week, the Sixth Circuit held that putting a workplace grievance on hold because the employee files an EEOC charge constitutes retaliation. In Watford v. Jefferson County Board of Education et al., 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 16-6183, an African American woman and teacher initiated an internal grievance procedure after being fired, claiming discrimination based on her race, sex, and age. She also filed a charge with the EEOC, which, under the terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) between the school board and the teachers’ union, triggered a stay in the internal grievance. The court nonetheless determined that the stay in the internal grievance procedure violated the anti-retaliation provisions of Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), reasoning that there was “not a material difference” between staying and terminating internal grievance procedures, and the latter had been held to constitute retaliation in 2006 precedent.
In addition to yesterday’s Labor Day roundup of labor-themed writing, check out Senator Elizabeth Warren’s review of the Trump administration’s record with respect to workers and the middle class.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
July 1
In today’s news and commentary, the Department of Labor proposes to roll back minimum wage and overtime protections for home care workers, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by public defenders over a union’s Gaza statements, and Philadelphia’s largest municipal union is on strike for first time in nearly 40 years. On Monday, the U.S. […]
June 30
Antidiscrimination scholars question McDonnell Douglas, George Washington University Hospital bargained in bad faith, and NY regulators defend LPA dispensary law.
June 29
In today’s news and commentary, Trump v. CASA restricts nationwide injunctions, a preliminary injunction continues to stop DOL from shutting down Job Corps, and the minimum wage is set to rise in multiple cities and states. On Friday, the Supreme Court held in Trump v. CASA that universal injunctions “likely exceed the equitable authority that […]
June 27
Labor's role in Zohran Mamdani's victory; DHS funding amendment aims to expand guest worker programs; COSELL submission deadline rapidly approaching
June 26
A district judge issues a preliminary injunction blocking agencies from implementing Trump’s executive order eliminating collective bargaining for federal workers; workers organize for the reinstatement of two doctors who were put on administrative leave after union activity; and Lamont vetoes unemployment benefits for striking workers.
June 25
Some circuits show less deference to NLRB; 3d Cir. affirms return to broader concerted activity definition; changes to federal workforce excluded from One Big Beautiful Bill.