Ross Evans is a student at Harvard Law School and a member of the Labor and Employment Lab.
Workers’ rights took a hit from a split Supreme Court yesterday in a 5-4 decision written by Justice Gorsuch that resolved three cases: Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, NLRB v. Murphy Oil, and Ernst & Young, LLP v. Morris. OnLabor’s Maddy Joseph summarized the court’s decision in an extensive analysis yesterday, writing that “[t]he Supreme Court holds . . . that class and collective action bars in arbitration agreements are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and are not incompatible with the NLRA.” Justice Ginsberg’s spirited dissent, which was joined by Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor, characterized the majority’s decision as “egregiously wrong” and argued that its “inevitable result . . . will be the underenforcement of federal and state statutes designed to advance the well-being of vulnerable workers.” OnLabor Senior Contributor Sharon Block and Harvard Labor and Worklife Program fellow Terri Gerstein explain both the implications of the Epic Systems decision and how federal, state, and local lawmakers can mitigate the effects of the decision in a New York Times opinion article.
The International Association of Machinists secured a win yesterday when the NLRB ruled that 178 flight-readiness technicians and inspectors at Boeing’s North Charleston, South Carolina facility “share a sufficiently distinct community of interest” and thus can be considered their own unit for voting on union representation. Boeing has said it plans to appeal the ruling, but a secret-ballot vote for the 178 employees to determine whether they want to unionize is scheduled for May 31. South Carolina, a right-to-work state, boasts the lowest union participation rate in the nation.
After announcing last week that the company would no longer use mandatory-arbitration clauses to prevent employees, contractors, and customers from filing sexual-assault lawsuits, Uber is facing its first such suit. Ingrid Avendaño, formerly an engineer for Uber, is suing the ride-hailing giant for “years of sexual harassment, race discrimination, and pay inequity,” per The Wall Street Journal.
Michigan’s Civil Rights Commission voted 5-0 to begin processing LGBT discrimination complaints, starting today. Specifically, the Commission voted to interpret sexual-orientation or gender-identity discrimination as illegal sex discrimination under the state’s 1976 Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act.
While many in the workforce have long feared that technology would replace their job, many hourly employees are now alleging that technology is actually minimizing the number of working hours for which they receive compensation. The Wall Street Journal details how employees for companies such as American Airlines and Kroger are bringing lawsuits against their employers for allegedly abusing time-tracking technologies by implementing automated processes that “round” time to the nearest half hour and that automatically deduct time for breaks–regardless of whether breaks were actually taken.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
January 8
Pittsburg Post-Gazette announces closure in response to labor dispute, Texas AFT sues the state on First Amendment grounds, Baltimore approves its first project labor agreement, and the Board formally regains a quorum.
January 7
Wilcox requests en banc review at DC Circuit; 9th Circuit rules that ministry can consider sexual orientation in hiring decisions
January 5
Minor league hockey players strike and win new deal; Hochul endorses no tax on tips; Trump administration drops appeal concerning layoffs.
December 22
Worker-friendly legislation enacted in New York; UW Professor wins free speech case; Trucking company ordered to pay $23 million to Teamsters.
December 21
Argentine unions march against labor law reform; WNBA players vote to authorize a strike; and the NLRB prepares to clear its backlog.
December 19
Labor law professors file an amici curiae and the NLRB regains quorum.