Jason Vazquez is a staff attorney at the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. He graduated from Harvard Law School in 2023. His writing on this blog reflects his personal views and should not be attributed to the Teamsters.
On Tuesday the Missouri Supreme Court struck down a 2018 state statute designed to dismantle public sector unions. The law significantly burdened organizing and sharply restricted the activities of government unions, complicating the certification process, requiring regular renewal of certification and dues checkoff authority, and functionally eliminating the ability to strike or picket, among other things. As the law’s sponsors made clear, these provisions were a calculated step in the direction of “the ultimate goal of right to work,” which Missouri voters decisively rejected in a ballot initiative the same year the invalidated law, essentially reproducing the language of the defeated referendum, was legislatively introduced. The statute, somewhat cynically, carved out “public safety” unions, which the Missouri Supreme Court concluded ran afoul of the state constitution’s equal protection guarantee.
A report released Tuesday by the Strategic Organizing Center (SOC), a coalition of major unions, finds that Amazon employees are injured at nearly twice the rate of other warehouse workers. The report attributes this disparity to the intense productivity targets Amazon imposes on the millions of people working in its fulfillment centers, which are central to its business model. Somewhat poetically (perhaps tragically), the report comes as internal pamphlets have surfaced revealing that Amazon refers to its warehouse employees as “industrial athletes” and instructs them to “prepare their bodies” for grueling toil. While the company successfully deployed unlawful unionbusting tactics to suppress the historic union drive in Bessemer, the degrading and dangerous conditions exposed in the SOC report will inevitably continue to spawn organizing efforts.
On Tuesday a coalition of California unions preemptively endorsed Governor Newsom in the recall election he appears increasingly likely to face later this year. The state’s labor leaders do not uniformly support Newsom, however. The president of the largest public sector local in the state, SEIU 1000, refused to endorse him, citing the steep wage cuts he imposed on state workers last year in an effort to shore up a pandemic-induced budget shortfall. (Newsom has promised to restore the wages.) Still, the president of SEIU California joined the coalition in voicing opposition to what he cast as a “destructive, costly and distracting recall.”
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
September 25
Healthcare workers rally to restore legal status for TPS holders; nurses at a Maine hospital overwhelmingly vote to form their union despite alleged aggressive union busting tactics.
September 24
NLRB abandons rule for offensive conduct during protected activity; New York home care workers seek a union election; maritime deck officers endure long fight for first contracts.
September 23
DoorDash settles delivery-worker pay claims; Philadelphia school workers win new contract; stock gains spur retirements.
September 22
Judge blocks ICE raids in Alabama; Chicago hotel workers vote to strike; AutoZone workers look to create first union
September 21
In today’s News and Commentary, the Seventh Circuit raises the bar for the NLRB to obtain preliminary injunctions, the California Primary Care Association sues SEIU-UHW for racketeering, and the Seventh Circuit finds that an employer group and think tank do not have standing to challenge an Illinois law banning captive audience meetings. On Friday, the […]
September 20
Culinary Workers Union members protests union leadership; lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft reveal internal concerns about the threat of AI training to human labor.