
Otto Barenberg is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, a federal judge rejects Tesla’s motion to dismiss an EEOC race discrimination lawsuit; a new OSHA rule empowers workers in safety inspections; and California considers a “right to disconnect.”
In a decision released on Friday, a Northern District of California judge denied Tesla’s motion to dismiss an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lawsuit alleging racial harassment and retaliation at its Fremont, California facility. “The N-word and other racial slurs, epithets, and stereotyping permeated Tesla’s Fremont Factory,” the complaint claims, as did racist graffiti “evocative of lynchings.” The complaint further asserts that Tesla retaliated against Black employees who reported harassment by subjecting them to internal disciplinary procedures, reassigning them to less desirable roles, and firing them altogether. The judge found that the EEOC’s complaint alleged sufficient facts to state a claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, while rejecting Tesla’s arguments that the EEOC failed to engage in pre-suit conciliation and that parallel state court proceedings require a stay of federal litigation. The EEOC lawsuit comes on the heels of an April 2023 federal jury award of $3.2 million to Tesla employee Owen Diaz for substantially similar claims of racial abuse at the Fremont factory.
On Thursday, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) promulgated a final “walkaround” rule that empowers workers to authorize non-employees, including union affiliates, to accompany and advise OSHA inspectors. Non-employee representatives must be “reasonably necessary” to ensure an “effective and thorough” inspection, a requirement satisfied by language skills or expertise with workplace hazards. OSHA’s guidance suggests that representatives can wear clothing indicating their union affiliation but may be prohibited from discussing issues unrelated to the inspection with workers. SEIU Local 32BJ President Manny Pastreich praised the new rule, which will take effect on May 31: “We commend President Biden for putting the force of law and the power of OSHA’s authority behind the workers’ right to choose their own representative, thus ensuring a fair and accurate inspection takes place.” However, a federal court challenge is likely. “The Chamber [of Commerce] is considering all options, including litigation,” Marc Freedman, the Chamber of Commerce’s vice president for workplace policy, told Bloomberg News.
Finally, a new California bill would give employees the legal right to ignore communications from their bosses during non-work hours. Assemblymember Matt Haney, who proposed the legislation, took inspiration from France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, and Australia, which have all taken substantial steps towards enshrining a “right to disconnect.” The California bill would require employers to limit off-hour communications to emergencies or urgent scheduling changes, and the state labor commission would impose fines on employers after three violations. “There’s an availability creep that has reached into many people’s lives, and I think it’s not a positive thing for people’s happiness, for their well-being, or even for work productivity,” Assemblymember Haney told the New York Times.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
April 24
NLRB seeks to compel Amazon to collectively bargain with San Francisco warehouse workers, DoorDash delivery workers and members of Los Deliveristas Unidos rally for pay transparency, and NLRB takes step to drop lawsuit against SpaceX over the firing of employees who criticized Elon Musk.
April 22
DOGE staffers eye NLRB for potential reorganization; attacks on federal workforce impact Trump-supporting areas; Utah governor acknowledges backlash to public-sector union ban
April 21
Bryan Johnson’s ULP saga before the NLRB continues; top law firms opt to appease the EEOC in its anti-DEI demands.
April 20
In today’s news and commentary, the Supreme Court rules for Cornell employees in an ERISA suit, the Sixth Circuit addresses whether the EFAA applies to a sexual harassment claim, and DOGE gains access to sensitive labor data on immigrants. On Thursday, the Supreme Court made it easier for employees to bring ERISA suits when their […]
April 18
Two major New York City unions endorse Cuomo for mayor; Committee on Education and the Workforce requests an investigation into a major healthcare union’s spending; Unions launch a national pro bono legal network for federal workers.
April 17
Utahns sign a petition supporting referendum to repeal law prohibiting public sector collective bargaining; the US District Court for the District of Columbia declines to dismiss claims filed by the AFL-CIO against several government agencies; and the DOGE faces reports that staffers of the agency accessed the NLRB’s sensitive case files.