Holden Hopkins is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, Boston University Graduate Workers are striking today, Michigan House staffers are organizing their own union drive, and new data reveals the economic benefits of unionization.
On March 12th, the Boston University Graduate Students Union (BUGWU) voted overwhelmingly to authorize today’s strike. Negotiations had been ongoing with Boston University, though the union says the latest offers from management have not come close to meeting the demands of graduate workers. In addition to raises which BUGWU claims are necessary to meet the cost of living in Boston, workers are seeking job security provisions, childcare, and better health and dental benefits. Today’s strike is beginning with a noon “Launch Rally” at BU’s Marsh Plaza, and is set to continue with pickets every weekday.
The Michigan Legislature has been the source of key legislative victories for labor recently, most notably including their repeal of the State’s “right-to-work” law last year. Now, legislative staffers in the Michigan House are pushing for union representation. At issue for the staffers include pay disparities, long hours, and high turnover rates.
Bloomberg Law’s Quarterly Union Wage Data report shows that new contracts signed in 2023 by a number of unions have resulted in the highest average first-year wage increase since 1988, when tracking began. On average, union workers will earn 6.6% more this year as a result of those contracts, and 7.3% more when lump-sum payments like signing bonuses are included.
This report comes on the heels of another recent analysis of 2022 Federal Reserve and BLS data conducted by the Center for American Progress which found a “wealth gap” between union and non-union households. That study found that unionized workers make about 10%-20% more than their non-union peers. The benefits are not solely being felt by union members, however. As Sunah and Will reported last year, several non-union automakers granted their workers raises in the wake of the UAW’s contract with the “Big Three” automakers.
The AFL-CIO summed up the recent data findings in a tweet, stating, “When we fight together, it pays off—literally.”
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
June 26
A district judge issues a preliminary injunction blocking agencies from implementing Trump’s executive order eliminating collective bargaining for federal workers; workers organize for the reinstatement of two doctors who were put on administrative leave after union activity; and Lamont vetoes unemployment benefits for striking workers.
June 25
Some circuits show less deference to NLRB; 3d Cir. affirms return to broader concerted activity definition; changes to federal workforce excluded from One Big Beautiful Bill.
June 24
In today’s news and commentary, the DOL proposes new wage and hour rules, Ford warns of EV battery manufacturing trouble, and California reaches an agreement to delay an in-person work mandate for state employees. The Trump Administration’s Department of Labor has advanced a series of proposals to update federal wage and hour rules. First, the […]
June 23
Supreme Court interprets ADA; Department of Labor effectively kills Biden-era regulation; NYC announces new wages for rideshare drivers.
June 22
California lawmakers challenge Garmon preemption in the absence of an NLRB quorum and Utah organizers successfully secure a ballot referendum to overturn HB 267.
June 20
Three state bills challenge Garmon preemption; Wisconsin passes a bill establishing portable benefits for gig workers; and a sharp increase in workplace ICE raids contribute to a nationwide labor shortage.