
Holt McKeithan is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s News and Commentary, Georgia lawmakers pass a bill to discourage voluntarily recognition of unions, SpaceX is accused of requiring employees to sign illegal severance agreements, and Starbucks agrees to begin negotiations with its unionized workers in late April.
The Georgia state legislature passed a bill Wednesday that would bar companies from receiving state subsidies if they voluntarily recognize a union through card-check. The bill will next go to Governor Brian Kemp, who has indicated his support. Ben wrote about this bill on March 8th after it passed the Georgia senate. The legislation was drafted and promoted by ALEC, and has already been enacted in Tennessee. Yesterday, John analyzed whether these types of measures are preempted by federal labor law. If not, it may open the door for progressive states to counter by requiring corporations to take a number of pro-labor actions (like recognizing unions after they achieve a card-support majority) to be eligible for state subsidies.
The NLRB filed a complaint against SpaceX Thursday. The Board alleged the company forced its employees to sign severance agreements that contained illegal confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses. While those provisions are common in severance agreements, the NLRB has said they must make clear that workers do not waive their rights under the NLRA. The complaint seeks an injunction forcing SpaceX to rescind the agreements and to block enforcement of any such agreements already signed.
The complaint is the latest battle in the war between SpaceX and the NLRB. The NLRB has already filed a complaint accusing the company of retaliating against employees who criticized Elon Musk and accused him of sexism. As John explains, SpaceX responded by challenging the constitutionality of the Board.
Starbucks Workers United and Starbucks have set a date for bargaining sessions with delegates from 400 unionized stores. Negotiations will begin in late April. The announcement marks another step closer to a contract after the company refused to negotiate for years with its workers. Jacqueline previously covered an agreement between the company and union to begin negotiations.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
June 30
Antidiscrimination scholars question McDonnell Douglas, George Washington University Hospital bargained in bad faith, and NY regulators defend LPA dispensary law.
June 29
In today’s news and commentary, Trump v. CASA restricts nationwide injunctions, a preliminary injunction continues to stop DOL from shutting down Job Corps, and the minimum wage is set to rise in multiple cities and states. On Friday, the Supreme Court held in Trump v. CASA that universal injunctions “likely exceed the equitable authority that […]
June 27
Labor's role in Zohran Mamdani's victory; DHS funding amendment aims to expand guest worker programs; COSELL submission deadline rapidly approaching
June 26
A district judge issues a preliminary injunction blocking agencies from implementing Trump’s executive order eliminating collective bargaining for federal workers; workers organize for the reinstatement of two doctors who were put on administrative leave after union activity; and Lamont vetoes unemployment benefits for striking workers.
June 25
Some circuits show less deference to NLRB; 3d Cir. affirms return to broader concerted activity definition; changes to federal workforce excluded from One Big Beautiful Bill.
June 24
In today’s news and commentary, the DOL proposes new wage and hour rules, Ford warns of EV battery manufacturing trouble, and California reaches an agreement to delay an in-person work mandate for state employees. The Trump Administration’s Department of Labor has advanced a series of proposals to update federal wage and hour rules. First, the […]