
Justin Cassera is a student at Harvard Law School.
In today’s news and commentary, the Supreme Court extinguishes ADA protections for retirees, the DOL halts enforcement of a farmworker regulation, and New York City announces new minimum-pay rules for rideshare drivers.
On Friday, the Supreme Court ruled in Stanley v. City of Sanford that retirees cannot sue under the Americans with Disabilities Act unless they hold or seek employment at the time of the alleged discrimination. The case involved Karyn Stanley, a retired firefighter who argued that Sanford’s retirement policy discriminated against disabled retirees. Justice Gorsuch, for the majority, concluded that the statute’s use of present-tense verbs “holds,” “desires,” and “can perform” indicate that the ADA protects only those actively participating in the workforce. Justice Jackson, writing alone in dissent, called the majority’s textualist approach “incessantly malleable,” turning the Court’s duty of statutory interpretation into “a potent weapon for advancing judicial policy preferences.” The ruling resolves a circuit split on the issue.
On Friday, the Department of Labor announced it was ending its enforcement of Biden-era organizing protections for foreign farm workers on seasonal H-2A visas. The regulation, promulgated by the Department in 2024, was intended to standardize labor protections across the economy so as to not disadvantage citizen workers who initially enjoyed greater protections. Several federal courts have since upheld or blocked the rule in different parts of the country. Explaining its decision, the DOL stated that the regulation has “created significant legal uncertainty, inconsistency, and operational challenges for farmers lawfully employing H-2A workers.” By ending enforcement of the regulation, the agency aims to provide clarity and predictability while “aligning with President Trump’s ongoing commitment to strictly enforcing U.S. immigration laws.”
On Friday, New York City announced a 5% increase in minimum-pay rules for rideshare drivers. The increase, which still must pass a Taxi and Limousine Commission board vote on Wednesday, is smaller than the 6.1% originally proposed. The finalized amount represents a compromise between the TLC and rideshare apps, who argued that the increase would mean higher prices for consumers. The new rules will also require companies to give 72-hour notice to drivers they intend to “lock out” of the app, closing a loophole left by the state’s regulatory scheme. Both Lyft and Uber shares reacted negatively to the news.
Daily News & Commentary
Start your day with our roundup of the latest labor developments. See all
August 28
contested election for UAW at Kentucky battery plant; NLRB down to one member; public approval of unions remains high.
August 27
The U.S. Department of Justice welcomes new hires and forces reassignments in the Civil Rights Division; the Ninth Circuit hears oral arguments in Brown v. Alaska Airlines Inc.; and Amazon violates federal labor law at its air cargo facility in Kentucky.
August 26
Park employees at Yosemite vote to unionize; Philadelphia teachers reach tentative three-year agreement; a new report finds California’s union coverage remains steady even as national union density declines.
August 25
Consequences of SpaceX decision, AI may undermine white-collar overtime exemptions, Sixth Circuit heightens standard for client harassment.
August 24
HHS cancels union contracts, the California Supreme Court rules on minimum wage violations, and jobless claims rise
August 22
Musk and X move to settle a $500 million severance case; the Ninth Circuit stays an order postponing Temporary Protection Status terminations for migrants from Honduras, Nicaragua, and Nepal; the Sixth Circuit clarifies that an FMLA “estimate” doesn’t hard-cap unforeseeable intermittent leave.